User talk:AGK/Archive/For attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Activity level: full • Current activity: observing

This user is an administrator of the English Wikipedia.
This user is an administrator.
This user is an observer on the ethnic edit warring work group.
This user is an observer on the ethnic edit warring work group.
This user is a member of the Mediation Committee.
This user is a member of the Mediation Committee.
This user moderates the VandalSniper application.
This user moderates the VandalSniper application.
This user is a Clerk of the Arbitration Committee.
This user is a Clerk of the Arbitration Committee.
The following user talk subpage an archive of archived discussions on User talk:AGK. Please do not modify it. New discussions should be raised through this link; to contact this user, see User:AGK/Contact. For an overview of old discussions, see User talk:AGK/Archive.
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents
This special archive will contain messages sent to be during my wikibreak. Any threads here will be attended to, upon my return. In the meanwhile, please do not alter or remove threads here. Cheers, Anthøny 16:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Arbcom

Are you available to answer Arbcom procedural questions? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 12:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I will try, but I can't guarantee the response will be prompt. What is your enquiry?
Anthøny 21:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48

Hey there! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48, Wikipedia Weekly's third talk with Jimmy Wales, is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.

Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!

For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

[edit] Oops.....wrong time, eh!

Hello, I just filed an application for Vandalsniper. Hoping to hear from you regarding this if possible. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 11:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Ahem...hmm. Any comments? Sorry for the nudge ;)Prashanthns (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ro098

It was actually (2/3/0)...I agree it wouldn't have passed, but I really do think you should slow down just a little further in your closes. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Bearing in mind one of the supports was from the candidate himself, and the other from a single purpose account, it may as well have been 0/3/0. Qst (talk) 00:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Aaah, unsigned comments always get me! I agree that in this case it didn't make a huge different, but as an overall trend, I'd sleep better if everyone would wait for a least 5 "real" votes before snowing. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I generally wait for around 6 votes against to snow the discussion, but in this case... Well, the candidate had 30 votes. You and I are both aware of the ultimate outcome. Best just to cut the candidate's losses and prevent any more embarrassment. Anthøny 07:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Requesting an Editor Review

Hi, you opposed my last RFA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gary King a few weeks ago. I have decided to open an Editor Review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Gary King so I could receive a new assessment for my recent activity on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time to look over my recent contributions and point out areas where I could improve. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Giovanni33 arbitration case

Hi there. I did a quick word count check on Gio's evidence and, just like in the last case, he is way over the 1,000 word limit (a total of about 3,800). I will leave a note on his talk page. Can you please action if he does not reduce it? Thanks. John Smith's (talk)