User talk:AGK/Archive/7

The following user talk subpage an archive of archived discussions on User talk:AGK. Please do not modify it. New discussions should be raised through this link; to contact this user, see User:AGK/Contact. For an overview of old discussions, see User talk:AGK/Archive.

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

[edit] WikiBreak

Hi. RL is interfering and I'm going to be here rarely for the forseeable future. I've asked the Rambling Man to help keep an eye on the Transhumanist's talk page. If you could keep the momentum with the classroom assignments, that'd be great. After getting the coachees used to Peer Review, I was going to let them loose on FAC and FARC, so they get an idea of what we really want articles to look like. Cheers. --Dweller 10:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem! See you when you return :-) cheers — anthony^[cfc] 15:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Defensio pro Populo Anglicano re-edited

Hi, Anthony cfc. I have re-edited the Defensio pro Populo Anglicano entry that I started and that you tagged for a lack of sourcing. Thanks for the feedback; I hope that whenever you get a chance to look at this, you will find it much improved.--MollyTheCat 22:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem; it's great to see you weren't put down by my feedback - although I expressed it as a large tag at the top of the article, I've still got the interests of the article at heart. Great work! anthony^[cfc] 20:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AMA Case

You accepted my AMA case at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Association_of_Members'_Advocates/Requests/February_2007/0-0-0-Destruct-0_2 two months ago, but still have taken no action. You promised me two weeks ago in your email that you intended to start on the case, and I see that you were very active, but still did nothing during that time regarding my case. Now I see you are on another extended break. Can you please tell me why you accepted my case, but did no work on it for two months during which you made many other contributions to WP? 0-0-0-Destruct-0 17:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Good evening; I'd normally start by apologising, but I've been sending emails for the past two weeks receiving (at first) no reply, and then error messages. Perhaps you could shed some light on this? anthony^[cfc] 20:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Since you accepted the case on February 3, the only email I've ever received from you was on March 18 where you wrote "Good evening; I'm digging up some links at the moment - bear with me" and nothing more. Since my email has been functioning properly during the intervening two weeks, I can't say for certain why I have not received any subsequent email from you. If you thought there was an email problem, why didn't you use my talk page? After your two months of inactivity dating from the day you removed my case from the list of open AMA requests, I had to request another AMA[1] on April 2. 0-0-0-Destruct-0 17:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Before I say anything else, please do use WikiLinks for internal links ([[link here]]) - it makes everything so much easier! I have now retired from AMA active duties, so I wish you luck in your case. My apologies for my neglect of this case - it's unacceptable; nudge me if I can make it up to you. Regards, anthony^[cfc] 18:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ok

well, i don't see the problems with putting on song lyrics. and besides, my friends look at my page. can i at least put on song lyrics?

-itachigurl5

Good afternoon; I'm not particularly sure what we're discussing here :-) if you could explain it a bit more, that would be great! I deal with a lot of issues involving reverts, so please do forgive my failure to recall this particular dispute. BTW, I've replied to your email dated today. anthony^[cfc] 15:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Post script — if you just write "~~~~" (or click the signature button at the top of the edit box) after a comment, it will post a quick signature (with time and date) which is much more useful than typing your name in full!
Post-Post script — if possible, can you change the subject header from "ok" to something more informative, if possible - thanks!

[edit] Sorry

I'm sorry you leave the Arb-Team; personally I consider your opinion is respectable and it is true, as well.

Yours, Neigel von Teighen | _{help with arbs?} 17:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts - it's great to see I'm not branded a lunatic :-) don't hesitate to drop by anytime! anthony^[cfc] 18:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Portal peer review

Hello, Anthony cfc! Since it has almost been a month since you nominated the UK Railways Portal for peer review, I hope you received good feedback on how the portal could be improved. If you would like, you could keep the portal listed at the portal peer review for more suggestions for improvement and ask the Wikipedians here for feedback. Also, if you think the portal is ready, you could nominate the portal for featured status. Either way, I hope you've received helpful reviews! Cheers, [sd] 15:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:MEDCAB/Cat:Kurdistan

copied from Archive, see below Cool_Cat was asking for opinions on this on IRC. My feeling is that if only you and CC are trying to do this mediation, this needs to be referred to RfAr. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 20:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll get some communication between cool cat and myself running; thanks for your opinions - they're greatly appreciated. anthony^[cfc] 20:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I am actually looking at this, we can discuss it on IRC right now. -- Cat ^chi? 20:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Y Connecting — anthony^[cfc] 20:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I have initiated a Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Category:Kurdistan. Sadly, people are ignoring MedCab to this date. -- Cat ^chi? 22:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

(reduce indent) no problem; I would take this case, but sadly MedCom cases cannot me mediated by a non-committee member without making a request to the chairperson. Good luck, and I'll be sure to pop in - the case has started to really interest me :) regards, — anthony^[cfc] 22:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion on the matter would be greatly appreciated. -- Cat ^chi? 22:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Drop by if you need me - and don't hesitate! anthony^[cfc] 22:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Formal RFM request was rejected at RFM because Francis didn't comment. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 07:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

BZZZ. It got elevated to ArbCom case, although currently ArbCom is leaning towards rejecting. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 07:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

If you would like my input, I'd be glad to give it - are you or Cool Cat on IRC tonight? anthony^[cfc] 21:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Thanks for the notification. I suspect there won't actually be much to mediate, since it's a fairly clear-cut policy issue, but I'll have to get back to you in about a week's time - I'm currently on holiday so I'm not in much of a position to do anything about the mediation... -- ChrisO 15:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem; more information is available at the case page. Have a relaxing holiday! anthony^[cfc] 21:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for looking after my user pages while I was away. The Transhumanist   01:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem - not that there was much to do :-) mostly just keeping an eye out for vandalism! anthony^[cfc] 01:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:LEGAL

Question regarding potential block needed on a user, and the Wikipedia:No legal threats policy, at Wikipedia talk:No legal threats - subsection, veiled legal threats?; please comment if you have a chance. Thank you for your time. Yours, Smee 01:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

Talk about blatant spam :-) I might pop in to see if I can give my two pennies — anthony^[cfc] 01:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your most polite response. I am curious - where does one go about reporting such legal threats? Smee 03:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

WP:ANI is the best bet ;) hope this helps! anthony^[cfc] 03:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Apologies if anything looked like "spam", I was trying to get some advice from more experienced editors in this particular manner, specifically knowledgeable editors like yourself that had previously commented in a civil fashion at Wikipedia talk:No legal threats. Thanks again for your help. Smee 03:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

My apologies - I meant that light-heartedly, and I apologise if it seemed serious. Don't hesitate to drop by any time, if you need any more advice ... or just for a chat! Kind regards, anthony^[cfc] 03:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

(reduce indent) Oh. Thank you so much, your warm-hearted words are truly a welcome pleasure! Later, Smee 03:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

*shucks* ;) see you around! anthony^[cfc] 03:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User messages

When leaving messages on user talk pages where you are using templates, please substitute those templates rather than transcluding them. Because you've put up many of your pages for speedy deletion, the tag has been transcluded onto the pages of the other user pages, clogging up the category. Harryboyles 09:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

PS: Especially your signature. Harryboyles 09:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not really sure what you mean; could you link me to an example of where a template is wrongly susbst-ed/not substed? anthony^[cfc] 10:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Timeline of Military Operations in the 2006 Lebanon War

Dear Anthony There is a silly dispute arrising on a page that needs your mediation. It is on Wiki, here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Military_Operations_in_the_2006_Lebanon_War. The user George.Saliba keeps removing all references to the rocket fire into Israel from Lebanon. Could you mediate this issue between myslef and Saliba pls. Regards 87.74.79.183 09:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

The user is continually adding redundant statements to the article (things such as labelling Israeli towns as "civilian towns", when all towns are inherently civilian and there's no such thing as a "military town"), and backing up their POV additions with edit summaries stating things like "do not use Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete. This happened Saliba!!" and "Do not use Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete.", seemingly admitting that their own edits are POV. Their edits also generally degrade the article, with sentences that wander well off topic, and stating repeating variations of the same sentence over and over again. Very much strikes me as a POV-pusher in search of "truth" rather than verifiability. I'm currently barred from reverting again by 3RR, but I'd request that you revert this edit again. I'd also like to request semi-protection, if you think that is appropriate. — George Saliba ^[talk] 09:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Also, for the record, I didn't remove any such references to rocket fire into Israel from Lebanon. I reverted statements like "However the 1,900 rockets that had been fired could not be guided and so were all untargetted. There could be no focus on any target for the Katyusha rockets as they are unguided. The rockets were fired indiscriminantly, and predominantly at civilian cities in Northern Israel." I tried to salvage what I could, but most of these edits were just a mess of redundancy and bad English. — George Saliba ^[talk] 09:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

George is continually removing information of the rocket attacks into Israel. Most days had no mention of them at all... until I added them, but most days still have nothing. George does not correct the edits if there is bad english or grammar as he alleges above, he just reverts to his Lebanese only POV where days only mention what Israel did to Lebanon. He offers no neutrality in the article. This is why I would like this issue mediated by someone neutral who can add the facts of the timelines daily rocket fire accurately. I am still learning this Encyclopedia editing business. I was just appalled by the lack of neutrality in Georges timeliune and so started editing it.87.74.79.183 09:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Y Accepting Case — anthony^[cfc] 11:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Is Cyclod the same as the random anon IP editor then? — George Saliba ^[talk] 18:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

That is my assumption; the IP stated "I've already contacted Anthony cfc requesting mediation", and the relevant case page has Cyclod (talk · contribs) as the requesting Wikipedian. Just to double-check, I'll drop him/her a message. anthony^[cfc] 19:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

You left me a message, but how can I directly email you, some things I can not talk about. How to create new articles?

I noticed you reguarly edit from IP addresses, so a reminder you can neither email nor create pages without logging in.

• Email me — please ensure you have email up and running; to do this, open up my preferences, and enter your email address. Don't forget to confirm - there's instructions on that page. Then, navigate back here and click the "E-mail this user" text in the toolbox at the right hand side. Alternatively, you can email me at anthony [dot] cfc [at] gmail [dot] com, but I don't recommend (until I've received at least one email from you, and can add you) that because it will be routed to my junk folder and deleted.
• Create a page — to create a page, enter the name of the page you wish to create into the search box at the left hand side - eg, Testing Testing. Click go; in the results screen, under "No page with that name exists", there is an option to create this page - click that text, type in the box, add an edit summary and save!

Hope this helps!

Regards,
anthony^[cfc] 21:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thank you for taking care of my EE MfD in such a kind fashion! Domthedude001 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Note: removed irritatingly complicated signature ;)

Not a problem! Glad I could help — anthony^[cfc] 20:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation status update request

Anthony, I see that User:Ryan4 hasn't responded to your request to refactor his input in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO. How long do you propose to keep this open? Secondly, there are at least three other users who should probably be added to the mediation - two are admins and one is an arbitrator. I won't add them until (unless) Ryan4 responds, as I don't want to waste their time on a futile mediation, but I thought I'd give you fair notice of a likely addition of more parties. -- ChrisO 21:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your notice - I was just about to monitor my DR cases there :-> I'll nudge him now. anthony^[cfc] 21:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism report

Hi Anthony, I just wanted to check whether the admin template you placed at User_talk:221.148.48.216 in response to my request for a block on the user, or the other way round? Thanks for your time, Phonemonkey 00:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for asking - I'm always happy to help! It's because the user posted an inappropriate report at WP:AIV on you. Hope this clears things up! anthony^[cfc] 00:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, all clear now thanks, just wanted to check! Phonemonkey 00:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiElf

How would I be reinventing the wheel? Metapedianism and the Wikielf exist over two different projects. Do you think it is redundant? I proposed it here. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 01:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Definitely - metapedianism doesn't necessarily mean at the meta wiki; it's over all the projects. anthony^[cfc] 01:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

And I should do what with the page? Request deletion? Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 01:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Not necessarily, but you might wish to tag it with {{historical}}; don't lose heart - I'm sure the article space would love some work from you! anthony^[cfc] 16:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Closing MfD's as "delete"

"Non-administrators generally should not close "delete" decisions even if they are unanimous. Only administrators have the ability to actually delete the target article, so they will have to re-check for a valid AfD in any case."

Please don't do it. Daniel Bryant 04:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I second this. While assitance is welcome, these almost got filed without actually being acted pm, making the process more difficult. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

"Non-administrators may only close decisions which are unambiguous "keep" decisions. Close calls and controversial or ambiguous decisions should be left to an administrator."

I also reverted this close. Certainly not unambiguous at the present time, and could do with some further input that your close restricted. As such, I have relisted it. Daniel Bryant 04:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

And this one, and this one. Neither are unambiguous; one I've relisted, the other I've closed as "no consensus to redirect" rather than "redirect". Daniel Bryant 04:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Also, I'd appreciate it if you blatantly steal someone's idea for content of your userpage (This, and the code is a near-copy of my userpage content), you acknowledge it. I remember that this isn't the first time you've tried to imitate me - actually, it's about the fourth. Put frankly, I'm getting sick of it, and your general behaviour on Wikipedia is reaching RfC stages. Ral's comment is so, so applicable. Daniel Bryant 04:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair do's - acknowledged, reverted with apologies. anthony^[cfc] 06:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

"Userpage/Base" page marked for Speedy; header reverted; general user page design reverted. Again, apologies - this was incorrect of me. anthony^[cfc] 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent checkuser request

This is regarding your post on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn. I have put the check-user codes. The check-user administrator who did the checkuser has mistakenly put all the users mentioned under my id. --- Sundaram7 08:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem; I've checked the RFCU subpage, and it all seems in order, but if it's not been relisted (I suspect is hasn't - there is no {{relisted}} template) then I'll do so now. Regards — anthony^[cfc] 16:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No problema!

Any time, Anthony! :) Anyway, I see that it has already been mentioned to you, but please allow me to friendly suggest you to refrain from closing AfD debates as "delete". When I wasn't an admin, I remember I stayed clear from them like bad weed! ;) I also see that you're eagerly waiting for input at your editor review, so if you don't mind, I'll give you my modest input right here. I kindly suggest you to relax a little; you seem to be taking the career to the mop too seriously, and trust me, you shouldn't - no one should. First, it truly is no big deal; more often than not, it takes away the pleasure from editing and makes your stress-meter levels skyrocket. And second, the more you obsess with it, the more you get frustrated as time passes. My most humble advice to you: have fun editing! Wikipedia is not the most important thing in life; there's nothing bad in whistling while you work. You have a lot of enthusiasm, and that's great - as long as it doesn't get the best of you. Be thoughtful, enjoy what you do, and be kind and true to your peers. If you follow this simple code, you'll see that after some time, the mop will be but the next logical step in your goal of helping our project. Have a great day! :) Phaedriel - 10:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank a lot! They really are some truly wise words, and your kindness is appreciated! anthony^[review] 15:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paytakaran

Hi. Could you please help with resolution of the dispute on this article. The page move is not an issue, the real issue is that verifiable info is being removed from the article. Some people just don't want to accept that the region was part of various states, and not only Armenia, despite the article clearly saying so in the main text. There are so many relaible sources attesting to that, yet certain group of editors prevents the accurate info from being added to the article. Grandmaster 13:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem; if you don't mind, I'll deal with it within the next few days (most likely, tommorrow), as I'm a bit busy in real life at the moment. Otherwise, I'll help out with resolving this dispute. anthony^[review] 15:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-05 Stephen Barrett

Hi Anthony - thanks for accepting that MedCab case. Here is some criticism that is meant contructively. It was inappropriate for you to blank my and Levine2112's comments. Your rules are too rigid and idiosyncratic, with too much emphasis on process. If you're interested in reading my further comments, you may read my comments on the topic's talk page. regards, Jim Butler^(talk) 16:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

That's some very interesting comments, there. I think you're right - my current system was largely built up mediating a formal mediation case, so it's probably too strict for informal. Please accept my apologies - would you like to start again? anthony^[review] 17:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure, thanks and appreciate your flexibility. Will do. best regards to you, Jim Butler^(talk) 18:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO

Thanks for nudging User:Ryan4 - it seems to have done the trick. I've added my bit; I'd be interested in your take on it. For good form's sake, I'll contact the other administrators involved in this matter and add them to the list of involved parties. -- ChrisO 18:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem - I've continued the mediation, with a comment under Ryan4's statement #discussion section, which you may or may not wish to monitor — anthony^[review] 20:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation Cabal case #Timeline of Military Op^ns ...

This discussion has been archived separately, in the MedCabal discussion Archive. Please see the main map — anthony^[review] 22:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last User Page

Daniel, I love your last userpage! Do you mind if I can tweak it for my own userspace?

Real96 21:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Daniel? anthony^[review] 21:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

God, I am sorry, I mix you and Daniel up for some strange reason (because of user pages/similar)? Okay, let's try this again...

Anthony, I love your last userpage! Do you mind if I can tweak it for my own userspace? Real96 21:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure ;) I thought you had the wrong person, that's all. Yeah - go ahead! Good luck! anthony^[review] 21:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barrett Mediation

I've added my initial viewpoint. It's a bit tangential, but given that the related issues in WQA, BLPN, and RFCs have gotten us nowhere, I thought it should at least be brought up. I can trim or clarify as needed, and I think it's civil given that much of the problem is incivility. At least things have improved since the ArbComm. --Ronz 21:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for posting your opinion; I'll check it out. anthony^[review] 21:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TeckWiz's RFA

Hey Anthony cfc. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@(Lets go Yankees!) 21:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

"R" - very mysterious :) I'm sorry to hear that - you've done some good work for Wikipedia, but consensus is consensus! anthony^[review] 21:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

And polling is evil :) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@(Lets go Yankees!) 21:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

And it's not ;) anthony^[review] 21:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your emails re: Medcab coordinator

Cowman forwarded me the emails you wrote regarding your ideas and becoming a MedCab coordinator. I think your ideas are interesting, but you don't need to be a coordinator to implement them. The coordinator position is more a PR role. I suggest you bring up your ideas for discussion on the MedCab talk page. --Ideogram 00:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I might try that... I see your point, it's just that the co-ordinators were never actually active when I've been round so I didn't have that knowledge. anthony^[review] 06:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for your help!

Booksworm Talk to me! 18:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem! anthony^[review] 20:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the help!

I really appreciate your help and your very fast response!!! However, I'm working on creating an article (East Grand Rapids High School) and I can't seem to scale the image of the EGRHS PAC down, with the frame around it. If you could help me fix this to a reasonable size, it would be uber-helpful.

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by CurranH (talk • contribs)

Replied at User talk:CurranH — anthony^[review] 23:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New Name! :)

Thanks for fixing that. Getting your name changed is very painful as there are simply so many places to go and fix it :\ —Sean Whitton / 08:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem — anthony^[review] 19:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I Can Still Make Cheyenne

Please note my removal of the history merge tag at I Can Still Make Cheyenne. I'm not sure why you tagged this article for a history merge - there's nothing from the redirect history that is part of the article's history. --- RockMFR 11:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

My apologies - I was in the process of closing a RfD on the pages, but whilst carrying out the tagging (e.g., the hist. merge tag on I Can Still Make Cheyenne) another editor came along and closed it as a Rename! My apologies for this, and I assure you I will strive to assure you it will not happen again. Kindest regards — anthony^[review] 19:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Editor review/Anthony cfc 3

Done, let me know what you think or if you want more specifics. Peace, delldot talk 17:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I've posted a reply; would there be any chance of one from you on that page? anthony^[review] 19:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Again

See: my subpage. Not all are listed there but as I get the time it wil be more coprehensive. Regards,  Razorclaw ⊚ 20070420180626

I'm sorry, but I'm not that much of an expert! My advice is to see a professional computer technician. anthony^[review] 19:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for all your help anyway! Cheers,  Razorclaw ⊚ 20070420194712

[edit] Mediation

I responded to your query that you placed on my talk page. My response can be found here. If the message isn't on my talk page, please see the archives for the time period of your original message. Feel free to post any further comments on my talk page, and I'll respond to you as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 02:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Replied — anthony^[review] 02:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your user page

I reverted vandalism on it. ;) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 18:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed ;) cheers — anthony^[review] 18:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Review

Sure, I'll review you later today or tomorrow, because I don't have too much time right now, and I like to say more than a few words. :-) · AO ^Talk 19:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem - cheers for your reply; anthony^[review] 19:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Admin Coaching

Yeah, I'd be glad to take you on. I'll set up a user subpage for you and we can start there within a day or two. Nishkid64 20:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Excellent! anthony^[review] 20:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] db-userreq requests

I found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user about 26 of your user-space subfiles which had been tagged for speedy-delete with {{db-userreq}} tags by User:Testcfc (which says that it is an authorized sockpuppet of your account). So I deleted those of those files where the request for deleting was clear. But with these files:-

• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/5
• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/6
• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/7
• User:Anthony cfc/wikipedia

it is unclear whether those are to be deleted or not, as there seems to be a bug in Wikipedia which causes a file which accesses a missing template to look as if it had a speedy delete request. Please which of those 4 files are to be deleted? Do you want any of the other files to be undeleted? Anthony Appleyard 21:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me;

• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/5 — keep
• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/6 — keep
• User:Anthony cfc/Archive/7 — keep
• User:Anthony cfc/wikipedia — delete

Kind regards,
anthony^[review] 22:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I deleted User:Anthony cfc/wikipedia as you asked.

Of the files that you db-userreq'ed, 3 of them were templates called by the archive files listed above, so I have recreated them with dummy bodies {{}} , due to the bug described above.

• User talk:Anthony cfc/key/othertalkpage
• User talk:Anthony cfc/key/Unresolved
• User talk:Anthony cfc/key/Second Opinion

Good idea :) thanks for your assistance! anthony^[review] 22:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IRC

which network? what nick? Lsi john 14:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Pardon? Anthony 16:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)