User talk:Aghalee2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Arkansas. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not steal my drugs homie, as you did with this edit to Queen's University Belfast. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tresiden (talk) 22:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Harry Redknapp. Tresiden (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. –Cheers, LAX 22:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please state the reason which accompanied the respective unblock request.
If none is available, use {{Request denied}} instead.
"


Decline reason: "You haven't provided any reason as to why we should unblock you. --  Netsnipe  ►  15:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I can't provide any reason, every time i use the unblock with any other writing it comes up in red writing and doesn't work, so i just have to write unblock and nothing more.

Please add {{unblock|YOUR_REASON_HERE}} to this page, and replace "YOUR_REASON_HERE" with the actual reason your block isn't in line with the blocking policy. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hey Diddle Diddle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Pseudomonas(talk) 15:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't vandalize my talk page again. Coemgenus 15:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Final warning

Consider this your final warning when it comes to any of the following: adding barnstars to your page from me that I have not given, telling other users that they have been blocked when you haven't blocked anyone, and putting warnings meant for someone else on other editor's talk pages. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 15:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "original unblock reason"


Decline reason: "No reason offered— FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.