User talk:AgentLewis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please refrain from reverting articles without first discussing.
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.
⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 02:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] D&D edits
Hi, I just wanted to say nice job on your D&D edits. Keep up the excellent work. --Muchness 10:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks very much, its always nice to be appreciated. Lewis 13:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Refs
- I see you've been changing the reference sections of some articles to follow the format above. Please see the format listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games. Robbstrd 22:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for the vagueness. Yes, if you'd use the format found on the wikiproject, that would help in giving all the rpg articles a uniform look. Though it's really not a huge issue, it does make things look better. Thanks. :) Robbstrd 23:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On Hallowed Ground
Lewis, If you get a chance to look at it, this source contains notes on the realms of most deities as of 2nd edition (particularly pages 172-182, a huge index). Granted, some have changed since then, but I always look to that source unless something else specifically invalidates it.
- Okay brilliant, i take it youre the one who has been adding stuff about the realms of various deities to the outer planes articles? I'll just go ahead and add that source as a general reference for all the articles rather than doing loads of inline citations. Thanks for you help finding these, its helping to flesh out the articles. -- Lewis 00:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Super Mario 64
Thank you Lewis. I tried to speak with as little accent as possible (I am from New Jersey, however, so it's kinda hard, lol). I will be selecting another article to work on soon, and hopefully you like that one as much as you liked SM64, and as much as I enjoyed recording it. Anthony Hit me up... 15:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Duesouthcd2.jpg)
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Duesouthcd2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Duesouthcd1.jpg
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Duesouthcd1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] D&D wiki project consensus
A call to all members of the D&D wiki project. We are currently having a major dispute that needs to be settled by all members of the D&D wiki project. The dispute is as follows. 1. Should we put disambiguation tags on D&D articles preemptively or should we wait until there is an article conflict with some other Wikipedia article. Vote on preemptive or wait.
2. What should we label these tags? Example "child's play (module)", or "child's play (adventure)" and at this point we are taking all suggestions.
email me at Dm2ortiz@aol.com or post on the D&D wiki project talk page
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The simbuls gift.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The simbuls gift.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gavin Collins (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Barrens of Doom and Despair
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Barrens of Doom and Despair, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of Barrens of Doom and Despair. Deb (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dark Reign Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dark Reign Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duesouthdvd1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duesouthdvd1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FRCS-1ED.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FRCS-1ED.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 12:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)