User talk:Ag2003

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Ag2003 and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. Try to be civil by following simple guidelines and signing your talk comments with ~~~~ but never forget that one of our central tenets is to ignore all rules.

If you want to learn more, Wikipedia:Tutorial is the place to go, but eventually the following links might also come in handy:
Help
FAQ
Glossary
Manual of Style

Float around until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. Additionally, the Community Portal offers a more structured way to become acquainted with the many great committees and groups that focus on specific tasks. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Wikipedia:Translation into English as well as the cleanup, welcoming, and counter-vandalism committees. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy. If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 06:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:MixAlco process

Please provide a proper link to the the patent itself, -fact reference-, it is unlikely that such a widerange patent is granted. Mion 10:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation to join WikiProject Environment

Hi there, I notice your background and interests. I am seeking to expand the membership of Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment to create a more informed vibrant environmental community on wikipedia. Would you be interested in joining? If so please put your name down on the project page --Alex 13:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Cesar thanks I will bear that in mind! --Alex 09:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] =Environmental Record Task Force

You are being recruited by the Environmental Record Task Force, a collaborative project committed to accurately and consistently representing the environmental impact of policymakers, corporations, and institutions throughout the encyclopedia. Join us!

Hi--
In line with what Alex notes above--I'm hoping you'll come by to check out this new project.
Cyrusc 00:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] =double ID

Is 74.192.33.146 also from you ? maybe by accident when you're not logged in ? (about Bioconversion of biomass to mixed alcohol fuels, changing a factor 5 ? )Cheers Mion 02:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC) OK, thought so, but wasn't sure, things are stepping up ? keep going, next, export one of these on the 100 billion budget to south america, instead of burning the crops they can convert it to mixed alcohol fuels. Mion 22:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please revert

Hi, your last edit on Bioconversion of biomass to mixed alcohol fuels is a shameless pushing for publicity, my request is that you revert that edit yourself, the article is NOT part of the PR page of the company, if i have to revert it, it will include a request for deletion of the article for advertising which would be a shame for the notable content. Cheers. Mion 02:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Hoi Cesar, no i thought you got the message, its a nice article, everything that should be mentioned is in the article, so why should you need a seminar link ? if something important there is said, put a line in the article, so we can check it. bottomline, dont push it. Cheers Mion 01:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Let me say that on the other side, if something new is mentioned on the seminar, i am interested, so state it in the article.Mion 01:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Clear me, your last edit outside MixAlco seems to be from 2006, exept from some PR edits on the Bioconversion of biomass to mixed alcohol fuels, do i miss something ?? Mion 03:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hoi Cesar, yeah you are right, my last question was not correct, you number or timing of edits is not relevant to the revert, i was just curious. so sorry for that. now about your contribution in the edit, a link to a promotional video on a seminar, my question to you, what is in the video states what is not in the article ? so, what is the video link adding as new information to the article ? Mion 02:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, as promised, i watched the video, and yes it adds a lot side of information, especially on the the possible economic implementation, whereas the article itself is more about the chemical prospects of the process. For me, i will revert my action, so other people can have a look for themselfs. Personaly i think the chemical approach is ok, however the economical approach is flawed, i detected 3 economic problems in the setup. Cheers Mion 06:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fact tag at Five solas

Hi. When adding a {{fact}} tag (or any other cleanup/maintenance tag), please try to remember to specify the full name of the month rather than an abbreviation (e.g. "October" instead of "Oct") in the "date" parameter. This is needed for categorisation of the article into the appropriate maintenance category (in this case, Category:Articles with unsourced statements since October 2007). You can also just add the tag without the date parameter, and a bot will get to it. Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 16:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)