Talk:Aesculus glabra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Ohio Portal Aesculus glabra is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.

	This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

	Aesculus glabra is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This page has been cited as a source by a media organization. The citation is in: Chris Spencer. "Top 10 Least Intimidating College Mascots", College News, November 15. (details)

At the least, citations are needed for the poisonous qualities of the Buckeye. Preliminary research indicates that it's species effects are exactly opposite of those described in the article, with the fruit being a danger to livestock (and perhaps more importantly to humans!) but digestible by some rodents.

That was from some edits by 24.58.198.189. It has been fixed to its previous state (of 2 days ago). --ChristopherM 22:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I've added a source to make further counterfactual edits easier to detect.Circeus 12:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)