User talk:Aerywood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Despite many efforts the mystery of the Unified Field Theory has not yet been solved: no scientific theory is known to exist at present that can explain all physical phenomena without contradicting itself.

The main obstruction to finding this solution in my view is the result of an error made in oversimplifying the findings of electrostatic experiments into laws that are now accepted to hold true for all cases by the scientific community.

I am speaking of the particular law that states that “Like charges repel”. Whereas in one sense this is true in that like positive and negative charges do repel each other in many instances, in another sense it is in error since there are cases in which like positive charges will attract each other.

The fallout of this error of simplification is that it is impossible to explain in terms of these laws how the positive protons of a nucleus are held together. Here is where the search seems to begin for the ever elusive particle or phenomenon that will help to keep otherwise repulsive particles together and here is where science goes astray since no such particle exists in my view.

The following is a ten point summary of the theory that attempts to explain all scientific phenomena having catered for the alleged error stated above.

(i) Energy, or the capacity to do work, is fundamental to matter and exists as particles of zero size but infinite stiffness, density and capacity for work.

(ii) These point particles of energy also possess infinite power and so are able to propel themselves in a straight line through space in one direction with a finite acceleration ‘a’ say. These particles do not emit anything.

(iii) Energy particles make perfectly elastic collisions with each other and obey all the laws of mechanics/ dynamics of motion.

(iv) Two particles held at a distance ‘l’ apart and facing each other will therefore accelerate towards each other when released and collide at mid distance, l/2. They will then rebound to their original positions and state or rest from which they were released and then reaccelerate towards each other to repeat the cycle of collision and rebound over and over again.

This they will do indefinitely due to their infinite capacity for work.

(v) From (iv) above it follows that a number of such energy particles located at distance ‘s’ apart from each other on the circumference of a sphere of radius ‘l’, when released, will collide at the center of the sphere and rebound to its circumference indefinitely thereby forming a Particle of particles. In this theory we take this Particle of particles as the fundamental Particle of matter and call it a UNOMA.

A UNOMA therefore is a field of energy occupying a spherical space.

(vi) The dynamics of motion of the energy particles of UNOMAS are such that two energy particles, decelerating away from the centers of their respective UNOMAS after rebound, if they collide will cause a repulsive force to be exerted on the two respective UNOMAS.

On the other hand if the energy particles are accelerating towards the centers of their respective UNOMAS, when they collide they produce repulsion between the two UNOMAS if their angle of collision is between 60 and 180 degrees and atraction for angles between 0 and 60 degrees.

For a given angle the magnitude of the force caused by collision between two energy particles is the same whether the particles are both accelerating towards or rebounding from their respective UNOMAS. From this it follows that the net force exerted by a fundamental particle if it were stationary will be repulsive.

(vii) UNOMAS are all in a state of constant vibration in space with the same frequency and phase of vibration. These gyrations are possible due to the self propelling nature of the energy particles that comprise UNOMAS. The frequency of these gyrations are at least of the order of 10^26 cycles per second [the highest frequency of vibration for Electromagnetic radiation].

(viii) Again the dynamics of motion of the energy particles of a gyrating UNOMA can and does result in the particles effectively spending more time accelerating away from/ decelerating towards the center of the UNOMA than they spend accelerating towards/ decelerating away from it.

This is the result of the hyperbolic shape of the paths along which the energy particles travel. The ends of those curved paths correspond to the slowest part of the particles’ journey and the part of their journey in which they are accelerating away from/ decelerating towards their UNOMA’S centers.

The end result is that the net repulsive UNOMA of (vi) above is changed to a net attractive one.

(ix) The attractive nature of UNOMAS enables them to combine with each other to form larger particles. When two UNOMAS combine some of the field from the far half of one is displaced by the field of the other thereby forming a bulge in the energy field. It follows that if a number of UNOMAS combine a large field of displaced energy is formed about the core of Particles.

(x) An atom then can be viewed as a core, called a nucleus, which comprises a very large number of these fundamental Particles bonded together. This nucleus is surrounded by smaller cores of particles called electrons, which orbit in the field of the nucleus.

This then is the synopsis of a theory that purports to hold the key to explaining all the forces of physics in terms of a single particle.

Aerywood

physicsforums.com and advancedphysics.org would be better if you want focused discussion of your own new theory of physics. Wikipedia does too many other things and also, outside your personal talk page, it runs up against the No Original Research rule. Of course it's OK here on your personal page, but you'll get more and better attention at those specialized sites. 59.100.49.85 (talk) 23:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Theory of everything, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 19:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

My apologies for the error: I think I accidentally deleted the contents of the page you referred to in trying to edit it.

Also, I am only now aware that the “subjects of articles” are not up for discussion on this site so that the manner in which I hoped to participate in the forums is really not available to participants.

I therefore apologize for any inconvenience I have caused by my awkward attempts to participate on your website.

Ayerwood