|
|
This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
- It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve it by citing reliable sources. Tagged since May 2008.
- It is missing citations or footnotes. Please help improve it by adding inline citations. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its references would be clearer with a different or consistent style of citation, footnoting or external linking. Tagged since May 2008.
- It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since May 2008.
- It needs enhancing the translation to be goodlooking. Tagged since May 2008.
- It relies largely or entirely upon a single source. Tagged since May 2008.
- It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications. Tagged since May 2008.
- It reads like a review. Tagged since May 2008.
- It resembles a fan site. Tagged since May 2008.
- It is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain spam. Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains instructions, advice, or how-to content. Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains a plot summary that is too long compared to the rest of the article. Tagged since May 2008.
- It appears to contradict itself. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its introduction may be too long. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may require restructuring to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since May 2008.
- It needs to be updated. Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains too much jargon and may need simplification or further explanation. Tagged since May 2008.
- It uses first-person or second-person inappropriately or excessively. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its neutrality is disputed. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its factual accuracy is disputed. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain an unpublished synthesis of published material that conveys ideas not verifiable with the given sources. Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains "Criticism" or "Controversy" section(s), thusly violating the Manual of Style. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may violate Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its neutrality or factuality may be compromised by weasel words. Tagged since May 2008.
- The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may not present a worldwide view of the subject. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its tone or style may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. Tagged since May 2008.
- It reads like a personal reflection or essay. Tagged since May 2008.
- It reads like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may be confusing or unclear for some readers. Tagged since May 2008.
- It has few or no links to other articles.
For some link suggestions, you can try this tool. (You can help!). Tagged since May 2008.
- It may be too technical for a general audience. Please help make it more accessible. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may fail to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction. Please edit according to the fiction guidelines. Tagged since May 2008.
- It is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. may be able to help recruit one.
- It may be too long. Some content may need to be summarized or split. Tagged since May 2008.
- It seems to contain too many examples (or examples of poor quality) for an encyclopedia entry. Tagged since May 2008.
- It needs to be expanded. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may need copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may need a complete rewrite to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain inappropriate or misinterpreted citations which do not verify the text.Tagged since May 2008.
- An editor has expressed concern that the article is unbalanced. Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains too many quotations for an encyclopedic entry. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.Tagged since May 2008.
- It contains a trivia section. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.Tagged since May 2008.
- It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter.
- Sections should be added to this article, to conform with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Tagged since May 2008.
- It seems to contain embedded lists that may require cleanup. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its lead section requires expansion. Tagged since May 2008.
- It describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style that may require cleanup. Tagged since May 2008.
- It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to NPOV policy.
- It lacks historical information. Please add it if you can. Tagged since May 2008.
- It is incomplete and may require expansion or cleanup. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain proseline.
- It is written like a resume. Tagged since May 2008.
- It lacks information on the notability of the subject matter. Tagged since May 2008.
- Its introduction may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's lead section guidelines. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia.
- It may contain improper references to self-published sources. Tagged since May 2008.
- The external links in this article may not comply with Wikipedia's content policies or guidelines.
Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links. Tagged since May 2008.
- It may contain too many colloquial terms, phrases, or words. Tagged since May 2008.
|
