User talk:AED
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Apr-Dec 2005 | Jan-Nov 2006 |
Contents |
[edit] Laser Eye Treatment
Would there be any change of a sep Laser Eye Treatment article instead of simply covering the topic in Refractive surgery? Please discuss. frummer 19:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Would like your views about an AfD
Thought you might like to add your comments about this article: List of articles related to quackery
It has been recommended for deletion. Please add your comments here:
AfD Thanks Steth 03:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bates Method
Hi, I'm having some trouble stemming the tide of nonsense appearing on the Bates Method page. I wonndered if you could request some assistance from qualified souls on the project page? I'd appreciate it. Famousdog 14:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- You haven't edited for a while, which User SeeYou is taking as 'evidence' that I am a sockpuppet for you! I have taken SeeYou to arbitration over his/her baseless accusation of sockpuppetry against myself and you. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Bates_Method Famousdog 14:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clarence Carter
Hi
Waaay back in June 2006 you placed an {{unsourced}} tag on Clarence Carter. I've cleaned up the page a bit and added some references, but don't know if that's enough to remove the tag. Could you take a look and let me know?
Paul Tracy|\talk 21:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Accommodation (eye)
I would appreciate guidance from you or one of your colleagues on this article (see Talk:Accommodation (eye) and Wikipedia:Help desk#Undeleting a Deleted Article for background). The balance between the classic Helmholtz theory and the Schachar has been upset with the last edit "Ronaldaaron" edits, and one of the admins is discussing adding a COI flag. I am an IT professional not an Ophthalmologist, so I whilst I can suggest a set of edits to fix this, these would be considered major and therefore should be made or at least peer reviewed by a domain expert. TerryE 03:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Extraocular muscles
A tag has been placed on Template:Extraocular muscles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Links
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)