Talk:Adventist Development and Relief Agency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
 Adventist Development and Relief Agency is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments
Adventist Development and Relief Agency is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church and Seventh-day Adventist Church-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church To-do:

|| I'm confused. Since I have never to my knowledge accessed or read teh page I allegedly copied.... In actual fact, I wrote the entire article with no reference to other sources. As an ex-member of eh SDA church, I regularly (once a year) doorknocked around my local area, collecting for ADRA. What I wrote was essentially my recollection of the information we were taught to give to anyone who aske "Who or what is ADRA, and what does it do?". So even if the text somehow turns out to be the same as one web-page (which I still haven't accessed or read), then teh information and wording is actually public domain, and no copyright violation would be possible anyway.

[edit] Dear confused

Your right, it seems that 144.139.5.57 replaced what you wrote with the glowing description from ADRAs main site. I've put your orgininal back on the temp page, so it should get back to the real page soon. --Terrible Tim 11:57, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SimonP

I think its time to put the subpage back as the article page. I'd do it, but I don't want to break protocol. --Terrible Tim 14:11, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)