User talk:Adoconeday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are an anti-quackery zealot, please go away. I can't fight you any more than I can fight the polar bear that invades my camp every fall, or the mugger who advances out onto the sidewalk to rob me when I stay at work too late in DC. You're a thug, and in this natural world I have to avoid you. The fact that you think I am a coward reinforces the fact that you are a thug by my definition. I hope I never meet you.

If you are a pseudoscience zealot please get some therapy. There is a limited amount of time you will live and breath on this earth, and you are wasting it. Maybe, just maybe you can be helped before you completely miss your chance. Science is man made, and thus is wrought with error. If you can't accept that science is not perfect, you have lost your free will. Therapy can help, if you find a good therapist. Oh, and please remember, therapists are human so they make mistakes, too. Personally, I think successful therapy is actually love, so maybe seek out true love for better odds than the typical commercial therapist.

If you are a healer, god bless. Thats not capital G god, but lower case. It means "keep trying" and "don't give up" and "please be fair and just and help others" because that's what healing is all about. It's not about cure... it's about compassion. Show me a healer who has never been evil, and I will be truly amazed. We learn from mistakes, an we learn to heal by observing affliction.

If you are a wikipedia moderator, I don't know what to say. It's seems so hopeless around here. Whatever you build will become evil, so how can you keep building it?

[edit] September 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Acupuncture. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ornis (t) 22:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)