Talk:Adobe Premiere Pro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (general): Filmmaking task force

• "Edit and video in real time" - Should this say "edit and view video..."?
• Is there an Adobe Premiere manual/guide we could link to at the bottom?
• I think it is unnecessary, also I don't think HDMI is a format. Commando happy!® 23:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Wrigley's is the #1 resource anywhere for Adobe Premiere help, and has been for many years. Anyone using Adobe for a while would have used Wrigley's at some point. I've no connection with the site and if others believe it's an inappropriate link please delete it Poweroid 19:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Seems like a good contribution. Nice link!

Husky 00:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• We should include a/k/a version info next to v 1.50 and v 2.00. Some Premiere Pro users refer to v 7.0 causing confusion. I'm not sure of the exact a/k/a version number, but will research and get back. Videotaker 00:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Who the hell is the goddamn idiot who made a redirect from Adobe Premiere? THERE IS AN OLDER PREMIERE --85.217.32.239 15:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I removed Adobe Premiere's REDIRECT so we can write about the older version itself. --PierreWiki 15:56, 12 February, 2006

• I changed the default screenshot because the previous one was an image of someone showing off their zune theme on their computer. --resxhacker

[edit] Adobe Premiere 1-7.0

Adobe Premiere redirects here, so there should ideally be a brief history on the earlier versions. Shawnc 01:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

I was about to say the same thing. odd. Where's the history on Adobe Premiere? Dave-G 21:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree I came across this page because I wanted to read more about the history of Adobe Premiere (a program I've been using for years the earlier versions). But I was very suprised to be redirected here, with no mention of the past Adobe Premiere versions. Limitedexpresstrain 21:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Future release/latest release

Should "Latest release" read 2.0 or CS3(3.0)? Because technically CS3 isn't released yet so it can't really be considered a latest release; but is it a matter of what the most recent version on the market is at this specific moment in time (2.0), or is it just what the most recent announced version is, period (CS3)? I had been on After Effects' page and seen the Latest release there as being CS3, so here on the APP page I changed it from 2.0 to CS3 to maintain consistency. Then I noticed in APP's history that someone had already done what I'd done and then another had reverted it to 2.0 again with an edit summary of "a future release is not the latest release"; and so I figured this might be a matter of contention. I'll leave it as CS3 unless it's decided it should be 2.0. Iamthedeus 01:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

So leave a comment that you have brought it up on the talk page instead of blindly reverting in the first place. Nevertheless, it'd be just as silly to say that Windows Vista was the latest release of Windows when it was announced back in 2005. I really don't the the time or will to argue about this, but I do oppose that a version that as of yet has not been released is called the latest release. --Servant Saber 23:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Que

Que? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.136.224.135 (talk) 13:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)