Talk:Adnan Gulshair el Shukrijumah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

	Saudi Arabia Portal This article is part of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Saudi Arabia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Should Article Have Info on Where To Report This Man if Seen?

It seems like it would be helpful to give the public some way to report any sightings of this individual.

71.208.230.97 20:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

No, we are an encyclopaedia, not a "terrorist catching group" - we have no interest in what you do if you think you see someone that looks like him. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 20:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

You use the word 'we' very presumptively. You do not represent the entire Wikipedia community-- you only represent yourself.

Any civilized person would want to report a nuclear terrorist to the authorities. Such reporting does not conflict at all with Wikipedia's mission.

In fact nuclear terrorism is a huge threat to everything that Wikipedia stands for.

Sean7phil 18:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I use the term "we" to refer to Wikimedia Foundation as a group. Not to the individuals that comprise it. "You" may support John McDonald for President, but Wikimedia Foundation does not care who the President is. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 19:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps a link to the official webpage containing the FBI's "wanted" poster. Not only is that not in conflict with Wikipedia's neutrality, but actually adds to the article. I will add it unless anyone here objects.   –Gravinos (To each their own*      _{*as long as they leave me alone.}) 02:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request Removal of Last Two External Links...

Having reviewed the website to which the last two external links point, I feel that they should be removed—or at least put into a separate section of links. The website in question Crusade Media, claims to be a news site, and its main page does indeed contain a list of articles. Most of these articles, however, have no bylines and a number of them have no dateline. Also, most of the articles exhibit considerable bias and a few of them are wild rumors (i.e.–US launching an attack against Iran next week, followed immediately by Indications US Will Launch Attack on Iran in April; both stories dated from earlier this year—although only the latter article contains a proper dateline).
   When external links appear in a Wikipedia article, it gives the impression that the information presented in the linked-to site(s) is in addendum to that article. Since the majority of the info on the aforementioned website is dubious at best, I propose that the two links to it be either removed, or placed in a separate section of links that is labeled to indicate their doubtful nature. So, if no one on this talk-page voices an objection in the next couple of days, I will delete them.  –Gravinos (To each their own*      _{*as long as they leave me alone.}) 01:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

PS–The fact the title of the website is Crusade Media, should be a good clue to any well-informed person that any news/analysis contained on this site is likely to be biased. –Gravinos (To each their own*      _{*as long as they leave me alone.}) 01:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE: I have commented out the two links instead of deleting them. If anyone has any objections then contact me, and I will then uncomment them and resume discussion.
–Gravinos (To each their own*      _{*as long as they leave me alone.}) 02:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)