Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is part of the overall voluntary and unofficial admin recall process and supporting material. It is a list of criteria developed by various admins who are members of Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall, as well as others interested in adminship who are not yet admins. Only the admin themselves should add their information to this table, as the recall process itself is voluntary, and so is making criteria or process information known in advance (although some would strongly encourage it). In addition to the criteria and processes developed by individual editors, a default process is available.

[edit] Criteria list

Admin /
Admin Hopeful		 Criteria Process Descriptions Notes
A. B. criteria process For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User talk:Lar/Accountability
AGK criteria process Live from May 2008. My process is a general openness to criteria, with the only restrictions being that any consensus to remove my tools must be supported by a handful of trusted editors; "keep it simple" from Firsfron springs to mind. The medium by which a consensus to remove my tools is expressed will be requests for comment.
Alex Bakharev criteria process from August 2006
Alison criteria process Inspired by Fvasconcellos and Lar. May simplify, but it'll do for the moment.
anetode I will relinquish the admin bit by request of five editors in good standing or one administrator who has earned my respect. Lar's recall disclaimers apply.
AnonEMouse criteria process Shame that something so simple has to be converted into "party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part...", but so it goes.
Audacity criteria process Firsfron's standards look good
BanyanTree criteria process Requires another admin subject to recall for a kick-off, while keeping the rest pretty simple. A tradeoff between broad accountability and avoiding unnecessary drama and process.
Barneca criteria process Pretty simple. An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
Bigtimepeace criteria and process Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.
Camaron criteria process A petition process followed by either a reconfirmation request for adminship, or resignation of adminship. Requires eight users in good standing to certify a petition. My own distinct process, but borrows ideas from that of Lar and Walton One.
Carcharoth criteria process I wish it could be simpler, but the 28 December 2007 page versions I've linked to in Lar's page detail the criteria and process for anyone wishing to ask me to stand for recall. Please check the current version for any major changes - these will not apply unless I update the links here.
David Fuchs criteria and process A straight-forward, three-prong description of my method.
Dreadstar criteria process Inspired by EVula's fine work.
Doczilla criteria process Per Lar for now while I continue analyzing what has and what hasn't worked in the past. Although, I must commend Firsfron's simple, direct approach.
Ev criteria process Using Lar's criteria & process for now.
EVula criteria process Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.
Firsfron criteria process Keep It Simple, Stupid.
Friday some thoughts Start an RFC-like discussion. If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.
Fvasconcellos criteria process Not as simple as I'd like. May revise soon.
Herbythyme criteria process I agree with the process & criteria created by Lar. I'd prefer something simpler but I'll anchor my process and criteria for now.
Hersfold criteria and process Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.
hmwith process, criteria, & such Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).
Husond criteria process Will relinquish administrator status with 6 editors in good standing's requests in a period no longer than 4 months.
Hut 8.5 criteria process Includes elements from a few other peoples' recall criteria.
John criteria process Revised long-standing accountability policy (which was initially based on Lar's since August 2006) in light of recent thinking. I will link to Lar's process; I don't believe it is a good use of our time for every admin to think up their own and Lar's is very good
James086 criteria process My recall page is pretty short but it does the job I think.
Josiah Rowe criteria and process Copied shamelessly from Hmwith, whose process was in turn inspired by Barneca's.
kbthompson criteria process Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.
Keilana Criteria Process Less liberal than before, based off of EVula's requirements. Still somewhat liberal.
Kirill Lokshin criteria process Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.
KrakatoaKatie criteria process Unabashedly stolen from EVula while I think about it some more, but I don't think I'll change it much.
Kubigula criteria process Based on Lar's and some others.
Lar criteria process Extensively revised in mid December 2007 to include detailed process descriptions, has talk page for comments and feedback.
Leithp criteria process Very simple, stolen from several others.
MaxSem Criteria and process Via RFC
MBisanz criteria process Some novel ideas with widespread notification, check the box style reports, and BAG recalled folded in with admin recall.
Merovingian criteria process I'm trying to keep this really simple.
Mtmelendez criteria process It's simpler than it looks.
Nightstallion criteria process I'll be using the very well developed criteria and process written up by Lar, as well. (The version linked to applies.)
Persian Poet Gal criteria process I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.
Pigman criteria process Completely ripped from Firsfron. Simple and sweet, no complications.
Remember the dot criteria and process
Revolving Bugbear criteria process I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.
Riana criteria process Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)
Roger Davies criteria process Simple and straightforward (and stolen from Shell Kinney).
Royalguard11 criteria process To the point I think.
Sarcasticidealist criteria process The process and criteria will be listed by the end of January 18, Mountain Standard Time
Sean William criteria process Short, simple, to the point.
SebastianHelm process and notes Avoiding bureaucratic overhead so we all can focus on creating a good encyclopedia.
Shell Kinney criteria process Pretty basic stuff, I think
Singularity criteria process Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.
SirFozzie criteria process Will relinquish administrator status with five editors in good standing's request.
Spike Wilbury criteria process Simple criteria and process.
Tbo 157 criteria process Will resign or start an RfC. Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.
Tim Vickers criteria process Simple approach from Firsfron
utcursch criteria and process I'll step down upon a request from 5 users in good standing.
Walton One criteria and process My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.
Warofdreams criteria process Using Lar's comprehensive criteria and process, for now at least.
Woody criteria process Follow Lar's processes of RfC or resignation.
xDanielx criteria and process Fairly typical; involves RFCU
Y criteria and process Will take to ArbCom or relinquish administrator status outright upon request of five administrators in good standing.
Yannismarou criteria and process Based on Firsfron and Y
52 Pickup criteria process Still not sure about my own criteria, so I'll stick with Lar's process for now.

[edit] See also

Note: this page was copy/paste moved from Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall/Admin criteria (because you cannot move a category page to a non category page). For the early edit history of this page, or for any GFDL related concerns, you should refer to that page's edit history. Admins should consider revalidating their listing by a null edit to this page. If that is done by all admins present when this was copy/pasted, that page can be deleted but for now it will remain a soft redirect.