User talk:Admiinship is no big deal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My concern about your username (Admiinship is no big deal)

Hello, Admiinship is no big deal, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at WP:RFC/NAME. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again! Tellyaddict 11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Tellyaddict 11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Well I think it would be best as they are not supposed to contain the word Wikipedia or any other Wikmedia Foundaton as it says in WP:USERNAME, also your username leads to the actual page about adminship not being a big deal, could you direct it to your actual userpage. To request a name change list it at WP:CHU and a b'crat will do it soon for you. Happy editing! Tellyaddict 12:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocking

Please don't add "blocked" messages to user talk pages unless you have blocked the user in question. You recently added such a template to User talk:Liamsmyth but the user hadn't been blocked at that stage.-- Waggers 12:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely for trolling. ViridaeTalk 12:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "please provide the edits that motivated the block"

Decline reason: "No reason to unblock offered. Please use the talk page normally to communicate with other editors. Deiz talk 12:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "accused of trolling. I will commit to a rename but blocks for trolling are rearely lifted"

Decline reason: "Unblock already rejected."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • You are highly unlikely to be unblocked without explaining your edits and making some very positive noises about your future behaviour. Deiz talk 12:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Protected

I've protected this page for 24 hours. If you're serious about contributing, calm down and give us some very good, thought out reasons to unblock you at that time -- in particular, what areas of Wikipedia would you like to contribute to? – Luna Santin (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "okay, I'm ready to have another go. I agree to edit mainspace only for now."

Decline reason: "Bye PowerRangerBuster.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.