User talk:Across.The.Synapse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] S'mores Image

You added this image with the {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} tag. I looked through the site a bit, but I didn't see anything about copyright. Can you point out the copyright information on the site? - JPM | 02:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, it has to explicitly say that it can be used for any purpose on the site in order to use that image tag. It's a nice pic, and I'd like to see it stay (got me a bit hungry, too). You might want to use this tag instead. But first check out some of the other images that are already using that tag to get an idea of some fair use rationale that could be used. - JPM | 07:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Films Banner

Hi, I noticed that you placed a wikiproject boilerplate on The Blob article. Just so you know, these templates should only be placed on the article's talk page as per the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject. Cheers -Localzuk ^(talk) 11:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Copyright Problem with Raspberry Baked Alaska

Thanks for uploading Image:Raspberry-baked-alaska.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 23:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wow

I want to thank you for pointing out that the Sun is ultimately the source of wind on the planet. I never even thought about it, but it makes sense, and that is so cool! Keep up the good work!!! ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 00:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My Status Changer

I saw your edit to my status changer. If you want to use it, tell me. Thanks --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 23:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Status Changer

I will make you your own Status Changer. You don't have to use Merlinus's. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 00:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Status Changer

I created your status changer. To change your status click on the text that says, "Activity Level" (the text is black, but it is still a link) and edit the page that it links to. For help, ask me. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 00:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Sweet. I appreciate this greatly.--Matthew 00:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

If you want me to make the link blue, tell me. The reason it's black is so people don't click it and change your status. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 02:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LaRouche

LaRouche is absolutely crazy. He's been running for president since 1980 and taken almost every position under the sun. He clearly does have strong rhetorical skills, and some of his early work most likely is a demonstration of this. Unfortunately, he's used his exceptional powers of persuasion to lure his supporters into virtually worshiping him. LaRouche's movement is known to scour college campuses for ill adjusted students who they proceed to systematically brainwash and remove them from society. Past members describe how they were sucked into strings of lies. Ultimately they are pressured to drop out of college and cut all contacts with all friends and families and live collectively with other activists. All this sounds wacko, but it’s the truth and LaRouche should be considered to be very dangerous. The only reason that he continues to have any voice is that he consistently convinces his small community of supporters to donate vast sums of money to his presidential campaigns. In 2004 he successfully raised millions of dollars by convincing almost everyone that donated to him to give over 1000 dollars. These funds are then largely used in the printing and distribution of his propaganda materials.

While he is definitely crazy, his past theses on the powers of persuasion and on psychological topics should not be discredited wholesale alongside his political stances. He clearly has demonstrated that he knows what he's talking about when it comes to convincing people to believe you. And as for his economic theory, I'm not sure, but I have a feeling it should be treated as highly suspect as well.

[edit] On LaRouche

As far as someone 'telling you' whether LaRouche is bonkers or not, that's up to you to find out what the truth is. My job is to present you with what I know to be true in hopes that you can form a more developed hypothesis.

I do a lot of lobbying in Washington, DC for an organization associated with the Catholic Church. I've been reading his magazine, Executive Intelligence Review, for years now, had exchanges with his associates, and have even attended a few of his webcasts. You could probably consider me to be what Washingtonians call a 'Closet LaRouchie'.

Anyway, as far as I know, LaRouche is the most accurate economist in history when it comes to forecasting. Look into the man's record as far back as the 1950s. His forecasts have been right every time. According to some of my contacts on Capitol Hill, LaRouche is taken with varying degrees of seriousness by members of Congress. Some do indeed view him to be a complete nutjob, but I've also heard some Congressional staffers use the term, 'genius' repeatedly. A few members of Congress from both the House and the Senate have met with LaRouche himself plenty of times.

My humble view? I honestly think that the guy is legit. History is full of examples of men and women who are persecuted by popular opinion because they decided to get up and tell the truth.

As far as the conspiracy theory stuff, I don't know of the work you're referencing, but I'll check it out. He does have a tendency to make references in his writings to a lot of subjects that his audience is probably not very well educated on. However, I can say that I think it's extremely naive for someone to think that conspiracies don't exist. Most events in history are organized through a conspiracy, for better (i.e. the American Revolution) or worse. (i.e. the assassinations of JFK, RFK, Dr. King, etc. A group of like-minded individuals want to create a certain result for the future of a society. Conspiracies happen all the time, so that really never bothered me much about LaRouche.

But anyway, I'd just suggest you keep doing your homework on the guy and try and figure it out. Hope I've been helpful.

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:S'mores.jpg

[edit] Image:The Decemberists.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Decemberists.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 02:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 22:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Across.The.Synapse

Hi Matthew. I'm taking a look into this case. I'll have a peek at the Socrates article and the talk page. Is there anything you think I should focus on? You can chat to me on my talk page, or by email. Regards. SilkTork 13:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I've just had a look. Appears everything is sorted. Would it be appropriate to close the case - or do you still have outstanding concerns? Regards. 13:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)SilkTork

[edit] WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 23:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Peer review/Ananthabhadram/archive1

Can you take a look at the article Ananthabhadram put out for a peer review? Aditya Kabir 17:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 20:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 20:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films roll call

An automatic notification by BrownBot 22:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Pythagoras, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 18:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apology

Is there anyway to fix up the discussion page at Pythagoras so that all discussions fit under the signpost? Also, you deleted my contribution to the talk page.across the synapse 18:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Fit under the signpost? I don't have the slightest clue as to what you mean.

Sorry, I reverted all your edits -- I'll revert it back to the way it was before you removed stuff.

I also undid your edits to the page itself, as you added some really odd stuff to the page, like an odd link in the middle of a word, just so you know. Gscshoyru 18:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Etching 02.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Etching 02.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. _→AzaToth 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B000065T2G.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:B000065T2G.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jacole5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacole5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shangalla Women.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shangalla Women.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lock up.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lock up.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)