Talk:Across 110th Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Comments

I came across this article and I was very disappointed. This reads like a capsule review of the film, using far too much praise and far too few facts. It says definitively that this is "not a Blaxploitation film," on what basis? What makes the dialogue so "intelligent?" It doesn't even mention the song from the movie.

I've never seen it so I can't really make any worthwhile edits. I hope someone familiar with the film can do something. --feitclub 19:31, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with this film at all, but its title caught my eye. For God's sake, someone clean it up. It reads like a damn fan's review. --Thorns Among Our Leaves 15:45, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

I've seen the film, and it has indeed earned critical praise over the years. I've given a cite to that effect, added the Womack song, and tried to clean up the article. Accordingly I've taken off the NPOV tag. Wasted Time R 12:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

I clean it up some. I'm uncomfortable w/ the section now entitled BACKGROUND. Darn: NPOV and original work. I did my bit. And it won't be on my WATCH list. And it's now 2008. Luigibob (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DVD cover

I replaced this DVD cover image with the original theatrical poster. (Ibaranoff24 18:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC))