Talk:Acoustic wave equation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

I am confused. How can you have a wave equation in N dimensions for N > 3  ? The Acoustic Wave Equation is supposed to represent a pressure wave propogating through space and time. Neglecting for a moment that String Theory allows for 10 or 11 dimensions, shouldn't a pressure wave exist in only three dimensions of space and one dimension of time? Rdrosson 04:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

It's merely a suggestion to make the article more concise by presenting the formula for the three dimensions at once (hence, N = 1, 2 and 3). Maybe consider to include the 1-dimensional discussion under the heading "Quantum Approach" (i.e. sound as infinitisemal displacement of air packets). Regards. Witger 08:05, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

The reason for presenting the 1D and 3D cases separately is that for most people, it is much easier to think in terms of 1D, especially when first learning new ideas. Moreover, you can learn most if not all of the essential concepts and fundamental principles in the 1D simplification without resorting to the more general, but also more difficult, 3D case. But, of course, we do live in a 3D world, and so once you learn the basics using the 1D equation, it is not all that difficult to move to the 3D equation, especially if you are comfortable with vectors, matrices, multivariable functions, vector calculus, etc. Rdrosson 12:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)