User talk:Acerimusdux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Sam Vimes 09:54, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Are your saying....?

I'm all for editing articles into concise information, but do you really believe ALL of the info you excised should not be included? Moriori 07:28, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, half the article was devoted to this guy's "invented" theory of the "inverted ad-hominem". It was interspersed throughout. Cleaning it up isn't easy, and there's one or two sentences that maybe can be added back in - like, perhaps the reference to Aristotle. But, given the source (I know - ad hominem), I'd like to see a link for that as well. It's public domain stuff, so I'll probably find it available at Project Guttenberg. But read the two; see the talk page - and tell me if you think the previous version made more sense. It appeared to me to be one user having corrupted what had been a mostly sound article, with alot of people disagreeing with it but too timid to go ahead and make the changes. Acerimusdux 07:46, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

OK. However, you say there is content that maybe can be added back. Would be a good idea, to balance the article. Moriori 20:28, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:NA-Congdist-GA13 109.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NA-Congdist-GA13 109.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Tobogganoggin talk 03:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)