Talk:Ace of Wands (Tarot card)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV
Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I concur. Tarot cards are not in the same category as 'occult' and this may be viewed as ignorant by some users. Highcount. 11:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Should we replace "occult" stub with "culture" stub or should we also add card game stub too?Smiloid 02:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I would vote for adding a card game stub too. That way you could have "balanced" stub links.--P Todd 04:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with adding the "card game stub" tag to this page (and the other pages for the major/minor arcana cards). I have no problem with the discussion of card games that use the Tarot deck, and an appropriate internal link (tarot (game) or Tarocchi) should be added to this article (and the others) to point to articles about such games. However, I cannot see the justification for including the "card game stub" tag to all of these pages as (I believe) they will never be expanded to include further discussion of the card games that use Tarot cards and, hence, the "stub" is a misnomer. Craw-daddy 22:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] copy paste
A large part of this article appears to be copied from http://www.learntarot.com.
I'm not sure of current procedure, but I will remove the section if it is not rewritten unless someone better versed than I am can show me an alternative. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] disambig
Wasn't there a British TV show also called "Ace of Wands?" I think a disambiguation might be needed here.Smiloid (talk) 07:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)