Talk:Acanthophis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Acanthophis is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use amphibians and reptiles resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Acanthophis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Still needs a picture of a death adder. Could anybody find one in the public domain? --Neonstarlight 07:18, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
[edit] YouTube links
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 19:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Additionally, and arguably even more important, it should be added that this person (220.239.212.87) also removed a substantial section of well-documented text that had several full references to support it, with the remarkable and strange claim of it being factually incorrect and malicious! I have now reverted the article back to RussBot's last edit and the difference can be seen clearly if checking my edit on the May 12 - 2007. RSB 212.10.82.177 17:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)212.10.82.177 17:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Remarkably, what was described above has happened yet again. See my undo the 24 Aug - 2007 of the edit done by IP 220.239.206.133. Rabo3 09:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
