Wikipedia:Abuse reports/Actioned

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• 61.69.12.x Range - Admin blocked for 2 years
• Wikipedia:Abuse reports/209.122.160.124 - Contact Failed
• Actioned 72.177.68.38 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was IP was indefinitely blocked back in February '07. --Darkwind (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Actioned 205.202.240.108 was actioned by Crazytales and the result was I'm bringing this to the Foundation, so that they can hopefully oversight the offending revisions. This is serious and it's not to be ignored, as the harrassee(s) is/are likely getting inundated with phone calls. Cheers, ~Crazytales 10:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Actioned 66.90.137.157 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was IP was blocked for three months shortly after this was filed, and there have been no edits from this IP since that time. --Darkwind (talk) 22:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• 168.91.1.189 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was Reply received from Ivy Tech that the report will be sent to their Security team for investigation. --Darkwind (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• 71.156.169.130 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was Auto-reply received from sbcglobal.net --Darkwind (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• AT&T (Mmbabies) was actioned by Darkwind and the result was Auto-reply received from AT&T stating they received the complaint. --Darkwind (talk) 21:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
• 164.58.153.153 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was e-mail sent but no reply received, will reopen if vandalism continues. --Darkwind (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• 216.11.184.10 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was no response to e-mail, can reopen if vandalism continues. --Darkwind (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• 66.210.229.135 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was no response to second e-mail to ISP, can reopen if vandalism continues. --Darkwind (talk) 22:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• 168.91.1.189 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was No response in > 10 days, case closed. --Darkwind (talk) 11:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• 152.34.162.5 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was message will be forwarded by network admin to the customer responsible for this IP. --Darkwind (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• 64.231.0.0/16 was actioned by Darkwind and the result was ISP replied that action has been taken against abusing user. --Darkwind (talk) 22:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• 216.205.224.10 was actioned by Nburden and the result was No response from the listed contact information. Nburden ^(T) 20:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• 195.172.86.3 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was Per above contact interaction. Nothing else is going to be done by the ISP, as they only accept this type of information from system administrators that must be verified by a Wikimedia email address. (ie: soando AT wikimedia.org). - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• 204.187.76.9 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was No response. Will re-open if I receive any correspondence and / or the abuse continues after the block is expired. - Rjd0060 (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• 204.38.104.10 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was No response. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
• 212.219.101.41 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was No further response expected. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• 88.196.29.95 was actioned by IP owner notified by third party. 15:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC) and the result was IP owner notified by third party. 15:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• 193.164.126.14 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was No response. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• 129.138.20.124 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was Per above. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• TV Cable S.A was actioned by Rjd0060 (talk) and the result was Closing. This has been active for over a year and there have been no recent blocks on any of the above accounts. - 04:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
• 96.234.59.44 was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was No response after 12 days. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• bezeq was actioned by Rjd0060 and the result was After receiving no response in 14 days, nothing else we can do here. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• 209.244.31.188 was actioned by User:GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was An abuse report has been sent and a reply was recieved. Mission successful!
• 74.64.124.160 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was mission failure 00:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• 203.122.239.199 was actioned by Prom3th3an and the result was Prom3th3an (talk) 03:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• 198.165.58.254 was actioned by Bstone and the result was IT manager was contacted by Bstone. No further action appears to be needed in this case. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
• 68.90.62.244 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was No sockpuppets since March, I think it is safe to say he's not comin' back. I sure hope this craziness is finally over. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• 208.66.198.220 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was Response received from Collier County Public Schools IT stating they will take action. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• 199.164.68.183 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was There's no known reliable contact information; the WHOIS information is outdated. I've still not received any response from the Webmaster, so relist if vandalism persists. Sigh... GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• 69.142.159.165 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was There's been no vandalism since February. I'm guessing that A) this vandal was disconnected or suspended by the Comcast Abuse Dept, B) this vandal has a dynamic IP address and is now vandalizing using a different IP, or C) this vandal has learned her/his lesson. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• 194.82.83.250 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was The IP is now blocked, and an abuse report was sent to the ISP, so I think it's safe to close this one for now. Relist if vandalism persists. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• 203.97.42.131 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was This IP's already been blocked for a year, and I've sent an abuse report to the ISP. Relist if the vandals resume after the block expires. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• 99.250.47.80 was actioned by Prom3th3an and the result was Hi, did the ivnestigation it seem like its been a VERY short spate of vandalism, however I have decided to contact the ISP and have done so Prom3th3an (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
• 66.31.172.121 was actioned by GO-PCHS-NJROTC and the result was Comcast said they'll take action against the vandal. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 19:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)