Talk:Abraham ben Samuel Cohen of Lask

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Kabbalah WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Kabbalah-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Abraham ben Samuel Cohen of Lask is part of WikiProject Judaism, a project to improve all articles related to Judaism. If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Judaism articles.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is rife with NPOV word usage and language. Examples include:

  • That Cohen "flourished"
  • "an ascetic of a remarkable type"
  • "subjected to the bastinado, for no other reason than that it was the usual method pursued by the Turkish government for extorting money from the Jews"

This is not an acceptable tone for a Wikipedia article, which is supposed to approach a subject from a neutral, facts-only point of view.—Perceval 01:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The first two issues are no problem. The term "flourished" is very common usage in biographies of scholars. It does not imply anything other than that this is the period in which the individual did their most important work. "Remarkable" is appropriate here as well, because in the context it clearly means "highly unusual." The last issue (extortion of money, etc.) should probably have a reference attached to it, as it could be considered biased. As the text was drawn from the Jewish Encyclopedia, however, there is no reason to think it inaccurate. I will see if I can find a reference for it. —Dfass 15:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)