Talk:Abraham (Avi) Loeb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Encyclopedic style
Obviously he's a notable researcher. But there is no need to "sell" this message by unenclopedic language or by emphasizing points which are still in flux or of minor importance. I've removed two paragraphs:
- Things named after him: Should be done only for things we have (or should have) an article about. I don't know the details, but I'm sure somebody will correct me if one (or more) of the items are of utmost importance.
- H-index: There are downsides in putting this in a biography:
- It has to be updated monthly, indicating that it is more news than knowledge
- It's really only needed for the extreme cases: To demonstrate that crackpots are crackpots, never cited but by themselves, and to highlight top-cited researches (with presenting the caveats of this measure). This is already done at H-index.
Pjacobi 18:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)