Talk:Abra Durant/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Review by Epicadam (talk) 21:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- No flagrant errors, but style issues such as punctuation appearing inside quotation marks (e.g. "The sun went down," he said. not "The sun went down", he said.) could be fixed.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- I imagine that much of the plot information gathered from the TV show was "researched" by a Wikipedian for addition to this page. If there are no other plot summaries of the episodes, then I think for the purposes of this article the work can stand on its own.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Better caption for picture of character in Hawaiian-print shirt is possibly "Abra's brash style is presented visually in his wardrobe" or something to that effect.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Generally very well done. It certainly qualifies for GA status, especially when compared to the article's peers in the WikiProject Holby.
- Pass or Fail:
