User talk:ABF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Präambel This is the talk Page of ABF. Please be friendly Old diskussions are in the Archiv1 Pleasee give a good headline by using == Headline == Sign by using --~~~~

[edit] User Ajjay & vandalism

Hi, yes I noticed your reversion edits, I would like to express that Ajjay has already had one serious warning for vandalism and colluding with others in non-English who are politically motivated, to have me blocked - anything I type seems to be erased by him ??

I will present you more of his vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Ajjay only removed some non-sense edits of your IP. He was completly right. abf /talk to me/ 13:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you be more specific on non-sense (thanks) I provided the link for reference:

[1]

If the above link is nonsense, please let me know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 14:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

This user removed a link, from the same source in a particular article [2]. He uses links where it suits his pov and rejects where it does not.ThanksAjjay (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR note for User Rtrace

Hi.

You left me two notes regarding the 3RR and the article King Solomon's Mines. However, I am a little unclear of what you meant by the second note. WP:3RR states that reverting "simple and obvious vandalism" is an exception to the 3RR. I believe that the edits that I reverted [3], [4], [5] and [6] all constituted vandalism and my edit summaries reflect that. Given that reversion of vandalism is an exception to the 3RR, I'm not sure how I should have been more careful, as you noted in your second message. Is there something I should have put in my edit summaries to make it more clear as to what I was doing? Thanks.--Rtrace (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Oups, sorry, I overead this clause when I read rhe policy some days ago. abf /talk to me/ 19:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfA Thanks

A message from WarthogDemon.

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

[edit] My RfA

Hi ABF! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3). I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)