Talk:Abdellah Ouzghar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abdellah Ouzghar article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

[edit] Suspect translation

"...forgery, uttering a forged document..." Eh?! We don't utter a document. I wonder if "possessing" or "using" are the intended verbs? --Mashford 20:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

"Authoring", maybe? Propaniac 01:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry guys, but "uttering a document" is a perfectly legitimate expression. See: [1]. Geo Swan 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm..not perfectly legitimate. I yield its use specifically in legal contexts, but not in general. Semantic accuracy equates "utter" with "speak", "say" or otherwise strictly verbal expression. However, legality places a subtly different demand on language, which I recognize here by not getting into a bigger fuss. ;-) Mashford 01:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

It depends entirely upon what the French charging document actually says. In many American laws, the language "uttering a forged instrument" still exists, and if it's in the statute, that's the language the prosecuting attorney will use to charge the defendant. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 05:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)