Talk:A Sound of Thunder (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Chicago Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Sound of Thunder (film) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

added category "chicago films". if you've ever seen the movie you know that it's clearly based in a futuristic chicago.

Jay Bones 01:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Might I propose that we add a list of the characters that die, i could do it but I would need to know the characters last names (I don't bother to stick around after the credits).09:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I removed part of a sentence that said that it's conceivable that the butterfly flew away from the eruption. How the heck is a butterfly supposed to escape from an erupting volcano. Besides, when it was last shown at the end of the movie, it was flying towards the volcano. 218.215.148.66 06:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

ZenMomentum 17:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I question the need to have a section on 'Scientific and logical inaccuracies' regarding a work of science fiction. The comment regarding the inaccuracy of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and zero tolerance is definitely a subjective conclusion. The Uncertainty Principle does clearly state at the quantum level that the outcome of even an ideal measurement of a system is not deterministic. This does imply that absolute tolerance in any given system is not attainable. There is a good explanation of this conclusion in 'Common Sense of Science' by Jacob Bronowski.