Talk:A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Reference from another work

User:Stbalbach judged the following to be unworthy of the article. However, it is possible that some readers of both authors might find it interesting that Nabokov referred to Sterne's starling in his Lolita. It is my opinion that it should have a place in the article. This opinion is especially strengthened when I see so many Wikipedia articles filled with trivial references to popular culture without complaint from User:Stbalbach as to the prudent use of article space.

In Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, Part Two, §25, the following lines occur:

Where are you hiding, Dolores Haze?

Why are you hiding, darling?

(I talk in a daze, I walk in a maze,

I cannot get out, said the starling).

This is a reference to the following sentence in A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy, "The Passport, the Hotel De Paris."

"… and looking up, I saw it was a starling hung in a little cage. – 'I can't get out – I can't get out,' said the starling."

--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lestrade (talk • contribs) .

You are right, many Wikipedia articles are filled with trivia. That's not a good reason to break new ground with a trivia section here. It is not clear that the reference your quoting is indeed a derivative or just coincidence. Even if it is, it is just simple literary analysis, if you were to go through Lolita or any other similar work that has many cultural references (say for example The Picture of Dorian Gray) you would litter Wikipedia with 100's of cross references - think of the number of cross references in all of literature it would be millions - that is why we have a "notability" clause, there has to be a good reason for it. This just seems like a weak link at best and not even that notable or important in either work. If you are serious about finding connections in Lolita or SJ, then why not find other similar cross references and create an article for it, like List of cultural references in The Picture of Dorian Gray. -- Stbalbach 02:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't want to litter this Wikipedia article with 100s of literary cross-references, "coincidental" or not. But if I find any mention of this book by Bart Simpson, in a Matrix film, or in a rap "song" by 50 Cent, I'm sure that such references will be acceptable.Lestrade 17:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Lestrade