Talk:A Public Affair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
Contents |
[edit] Very subjective statement
"The album was poorly received by fans and saw very low sales." Very low sales compared to what? A very bias statement. Maybe something like "The album was poorly received by many fans and saw very low sales in comparison to her other albums." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassguiboy (talk • contribs) 23:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Between You And I
I can't believe she could name a song this. It's between you and me, at least among anyone who's completed high school. I haven't seen such a prominent case of this dumb mistake since the Backstreet Boys sang in their song Darlin' in their self-titled album, "...that it can be for you and I". (In that case, it should have been for you and me, and as a free bonus, me would then rhyme with be!) Reswobslc 21:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- The discussions pages on wikipedia are used for users to talk about the page, like how it can be improved and problems. This is not a discussion board and not used for personal opinions Generation talk123 02:25, 31 December 2006
- If that's even true, then I suppose my talk page, and not this page, is the correct place to assert a rule you don't even follow yourself. (example example). But I suppose you're right - my comment about her song title can't make it or the article any better, as the blunder is set in stone on her CD, and there's not much more anyone can say about it. Reswobslc 03:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually that was times when I just started using wikipedia and was not completely clear on the rules, I did not turn this into an arguement. I was just providing information, so if you want to argue go somewhere else, I am just making it clear that I am only replying to a message that needs commenting on. Have a nice day. Generation talk123 23:18, 1 January 2007
- If that's even true, then I suppose my talk page, and not this page, is the correct place to assert a rule you don't even follow yourself. (example example). But I suppose you're right - my comment about her song title can't make it or the article any better, as the blunder is set in stone on her CD, and there's not much more anyone can say about it. Reswobslc 03:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- The discussions pages on wikipedia are used for users to talk about the page, like how it can be improved and problems. This is not a discussion board and not used for personal opinions Generation talk123 02:25, 31 December 2006
[edit] Sources
Where does it say "Fired Up" will be the third single as there doesn't seem to be a reference [proof] to this being the third single. Also is it necessary to include the lyrics? Generation talk123 02:29, 31 December 2006
== It is not her highest chart position In This Skin is and she is recording a new album.
[edit] add the hebrew wikipedia
there is a page about this ablum of jessica at the hebrew wikipedia too...you should add it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.109.39.143 (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC).
