Talk:A.P.B. (arcade game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Inclusion of hardware info
A.P.B. - All Points Bulletin | |||||
Developer: | Atari Games | ||||
Publisher: | Atari Games | ||||
Release date: | 1987 | ||||
Genre: | Driving game | ||||
Game modes: | 1 player | ||||
Cabinet: | Standard and sit-down (convertible) | ||||
Controls: | Steering wheel, siren button, "fire" button, accelerator pedal | ||||
System hardware/Arcade system | |||||
This game runs on the Atari System 2
|
|||||
Monitor | |||||
Orientation: | Vertical | ||||
Type: | Raster, medium resolution | ||||
Size: | 19 inch | ||||
Notes | |||||
Developed during the Golden Age of Arcade Games. Cabinet could be converted to a sit-down with a detachable seat. |
AshSert keeps adding hardware info to the infobox of arcade games. While I don't object to hardware info in the article—though I do think it is a little superfluous—I do object to it being in the infobox.
The infobox is used for a quick overview of information included in the article. Look at the infobox as it was editited by AshSert at right. Not only is the "hardware section" much larger than the other sections, the information that the game used a simple joystick is patently wrong. The hardware information dominates all the other information in the infobox and makes other relevant information included in it harder to find.
If one feels that hardware information needs to be inlcuded in the article, that's fine. Create a new section and include it there. Anyone who cares about such information can easily find it. Plus, it gives the editor more room to expound on such information as much as they please.
See The WikiProject:Arcade games talk page for our previous discussion on this matter. — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:36, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Update
Any discussion on this topic should go on the Arcade games WikiProject Talk page. — Frecklefoot | Talk 22:12, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Citation needed ??
"A.P.B. was also the inspiration for the hugely successful Grand Theft Auto series."
This sentence has a {{Fact}}-tag does anyone really dispute it ?????? have a look at the screenshot. i mean really ?-- ExpImptalkcon 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I do. Just because the games look similar doesn't mean one served as inspiration for the other. The top-down view is a popular one and just because they both use it doesn't mean they are related, or one inspired the other. Plus the premises are totally different: in A.P.B. the player is a cop, in GTA, the player is a lawbreaker. — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- The creator of A.P.B. has sued DMA designs (now Rockstar North) because he beleived that GTA is in fact a clone of his game. The people behind the original GTA however state that they had never seen the game prior to the lawsuit. Blokker 1999 20:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- It'd be great if you could include that fact with a citation in the article.
- On a related note, Atari Games (who developed A.P.B.) was sued by a kid who claimed they ripped off his idea for a newspaper delivery game with Paperboy. He sent in his idea, but they returned it without looking at it per their policy of not taking external submissions for game ideas. Anyway, he sued them and they had to find early design documents that showed they were already thinking about such a game before he submitted his idea. Anyway, games borrowing from one another is typical and often unintentional. All games are related in so many ways that proving one copied another in one way or another is difficult. — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Apbscreenshot.png
Image:Apbscreenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)