User talk:A.M.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to learn more about the contribution process, definitely check out the tutorial. It's a really simple and easy explanation of all the basics.
TIPS:
- If you have any questions about Wikipedia and don't know where to look, try the How do I do that? section of help.
- Get your feet wet as soon as you can by being bold in editing (and using the Show Preview button).
- Read what Wikipedia is not.
- Learn how to avoid common mistakes.
- At Wikipedia, neutrality means representing all viewpoints as opposed to just one. Read the neutral point of view tutorial to learn more.
- As you learn more about Wikipedia, you may want to check out the Manual of Style and the Policies and Guidelines.
Enjoy your stay and feel free to reply to this welcome message on my talk page. - user:defunkt
(To sign a post like I just did, enter three tildes ~~~ where you want your name to appear. The three tildes will automatically be converted into your username. Adding a fourth tilde will insert a timestamp, as well.)
Welcome to the project! I saw your note on the new user log, and just wanted to say hi. The disambiguation page at Solomon's Seal is good work. Hope you stick around and do more. Isomorphic 17:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletions
Hi! Thanks for the good work on looking through the new pages. Just one point - when you write the reason part of the deletebecause, something like "case 4" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Fitzgerald%27s_Ginkus_Noodles) is somewhat ambiguous and not at all clear when i read it! However, if you don't want to type a long comment for each, just {{delete}} without the reason will do, usually it's obvious. Thanks. Enochlau 09:09, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] More on Speedy Deletions
I don't think that speedy deletions are right for the articles that you have just nominated, e.g. Andrew Gower. It is true that they are very short, but Wikipedia contains many articles which are just as short and have been kept. I do not know enough about the subjects of the articles to tell whether they should be deleted after a VFD vote, but I think that thes earticles, which do contain some content, would need a well-thought-out discussion before deleting them. Some of these articles look like they have no content because they are unformatted, and that is easily fixed. Try looking at Wikipedia:Deletion log to see what sorts of things are usually deleted. Academic Challenger 10:12, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Ok. — A.M. 21:26, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Verities of Rice --> Category:Varieties of rice
Thanks for adding this listing. I copied your request to the Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Speedy renaming section. Simple typo fixes and the like can go there, so that they get taken care of more quickly. --Idont Havaname 02:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] LinkStation Merge with Kuro Box
I agree with you, I essentially merged the content into the LinkStation entry. See what you think, it could serve as a combined entry for Kurobox Terastation, and LinkstationRaumka 05:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Use of rollback
Don't use rolback to revert good faith edits, for example the removal of unsourced content that has been tagged for over a year. Thanks, Addhoc 10:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
