Talk:A. K. Fazlul Huq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article A. K. Fazlul Huq was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.


This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Contents

[edit] Bengali name

Abul Kashem Fazlul Huq (Bengali: আবুল কাসেম ফজলুল হক) -- here the part of name "Kashem (কাসেম)" isn't spelled correctly, I guess. Because in Bengali SH refers to and S refers to . It should be either Kashem with or Kasem with . --NAHID 13:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. - Arman (Talk) 01:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

FROM IQBAL50000: Sher-e-Bangla is actually a phrase of Persian origin, meaning Bengal tiger or tiger of Bengal. In Urdu it happens to have the same meaning, as Urdu has adopted many Persian and Arabic phrases and words. This is what distinguishes Urdu from Hindi.

[edit] Info Chart

I tried adding the spouse and children name in my grandfather's info box, but it fails to appear. Can someone fix this? Thanks in advance. The Minister 06:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

wow, he's a kind of grandfather to me as well. Anyway, I got the Chotoder Fazlul Huq book. will add some info from there. Regards--Tarif from Bangladesh 01:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article

Looks good to me. Minor issues are my distaste for Harvard referencing and no explanation of what a "Pathshala" is. Otherwise good though; nice job.--SeizureDog (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Delisted GA

This does not meet the GA criteria (WP:GA?). At a glance, it fails 2b (no inline citation) and 1a (the prose is poor in many areas). Thus, I have removed it from the GA list (WP:GA). You can argue this at WP:GAR. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good article reassessment

This article was nominated for good article reassessment to determine whether or not it met the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. The article was not relisted. Please see the archived discussion for further information. PeterSymonds | talk 11:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)