From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the UK Roads WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's road network. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects.
Click [show] for further details |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Surrey in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.) |
Low |
This article is on a subject of low-importance for Surrey-related articles. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
Surrey WikiProject tasks:
|
|
The statement that the "A25 terminates at Wrotham Heath" sounds as though everything stops!. The idea of a road is that it is a means whereby traffic gets from place to place, so the fact that a road may not exactly reach its destination, doesn't means that its purpose isn't to do that. Hence I use the words "it carries traffic". And a little bit of history never does any harm! Perhaps later writers might add the names of some of the inns? Peter Shearan 15:42, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Notability
Removed prod template
An anon added the above template to the main article. The article is a stub, and is generally up to the standard of similar articles. Please explain here why the article needs saving or deleting. Thanks, Ian Cairns 22:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- As you say this a stub that needs expanding. I don't think the prod is relevant for the article. Regan123 03:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- I have removed the prod.Regan123 13:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)