Talk:Aérospatiale Puma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was the article was not merged. --Born2flie 02:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge IAR 330

  • Support. Seems to be only a license-built aircraft and there is precedent to simply mention those aircraft under the variant they were license-built as. --Born2flie 00:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. - BillCJ 01:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I think there is a quite large potential to expand this article, especially considering the new IAR 330 naval helicopter variant(Puma NAVAL);also the IAR 330 SOCAT has large modifications made by IAR in cooperation with Elbit Systems(Israel) and it's quite different comparing to Aérospatiale Puma original version. I suggest we should wait until 15 April to make a final decision.

Eurocopter Tigre 16:25, 16 March 2007 (EET)

  • Oppose See also my vote on the suggested merge of IAR 316 into Aérospatiale Alouette III. Mentatus 20:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose - There are a large number of differences between the Puma and the IAR 330, even some improvements. Many other online sources differentiate between the two. I recently bought a book about miliary helicopters, and in the book the author even found the need to put the IAR 330 and Puma, as well as the IAR 316 and Alouette III, on different pages from one another. Many consider them very unique and would expect seperate articles, just as we already have for the Atlas Oryx, a development of the Puma that deserves its own article, as it has many differences over the French Puma.--SAWGunner89 11:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I certainly haven't seen any of those differences highlighted here in this article. --Born2flie 02:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.