Talk:9x18mm Makarov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

Contents 1 Article Renaming 2 Less Powerful? 3 Energy 4 Hi-Impulse Variant?

[edit] Article Renaming

As per the general consensus from the team at Wikiproject: Military History, it would seem that this article really ought to be named "9x18 Makarov". I thought I'd give people a chance to comment before changing the title or moving the article, though. --Commander Zulu 08:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Yes I agree, but with the addition of the metric "mm" unit, no space naturally ;), so 9x18mm Makarov?. Koalorka (talk) 23:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Less Powerful?

According to this and this 9 mm Luger Parabellum is more powerful, contrary to what article says. 217.26.163.26 10:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Energy

Does anyone have energy info on this cartridge? C0N6R355 20:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I just did the math based on the given mass and velocity; it comes to 313 J. 140.183.63.33 13:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi-Impulse Variant?

Perhaps there should be some mention of the hi-impulse variant. [1] 207.195.244.215 (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)