Talk:9Dragons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] 9Dragons Online Description/Beta Info
I found it important to create the wiki article, after playing 9Dragons for awile as 9Dragons is growing greatly in popularity. Iv posted basic game information along with known Closed/Open beta updates. I also found it important to insert a list of all the clans as it complimented the overall quality and information of the page. --Sk8tr948 14:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
i am wondering why there are 2 9 dragons pages??. is it supposed to be like that?/ theres one for 9dragons and one for 9 dragons..lol
[edit] Rewrite the Article
Please rewrite the article to make it more like wiki entry instead of an advertisement. Use more neutral tone, avoid words such as "cutting edge" without providing any citations or supports. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.104.100.169 (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2007
[edit] Bias?
"Developed by award winning Indy21 team, this game is destined to set a new standard for MMORPGs."
One might think such a line would be bias. Mayhap we look over it?Wassamatta 12:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Wassamatta
- Do you go to Wassamatta U? Yes, I think this article is still bias, but you'd need sources. It sounds like an advertisement right now because it's basically taken from one.
[edit] Merge
I have just proposed a merge with the 9Dragons and 9Dragons Online articles. They cover the same material, only 9Dragons is a bit more crufty. Although 9Dragons is more crufty, I think that it would still be a better title. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 22:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with you, 9Dragons is much more better than 9Dragons Online as the games is known as 9Dragons shown in MMORPG games list --Drahgo 15:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References to Condor Heroes series
This first thing I noticed when I started playing the game was the several similarities to the wuxia novel The Legend of the Condor Heroes and its sequels. Is this something that could be added into the article, or would it be along the lines of mindless trivia and therefore shouldn't be included? SunsetFlare (talk) 08:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)