Talk:9 x 21 mm IMI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

I'd love to know why Italy has banned the 9mm Luger... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.129.224.36 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 25 February 2007 UTC.

As would I. A source for that would also be nice. The 9mm Luger article (and even the Italian version of that article, via Babelfish) says nothing about that. — Redxiv 05:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ballistic Energy for 9x21 IMI over *1000) Joules???

I've been comparing the ballistic performance if the 9x21mm to the 9mm Luger, and by convention of the article, the ballistic energy of the two should be more or less the same. But according to the ballistic energy data table in this article, the 9x21 packs a whopping 1041 Joules of energy for a 124 gr FMJ travelling at 360 m/s. Comapre this to ~484 J for 9mm Luger 115 gr FMJ at 1180 ft/s (~360 m/s) and even the .45 ACP 185 gr JHP at 950 ft/s (~290 m/s) 371 ft·lbf (~505 J). This is a major miscalculation.. please see to it ASAP, thanx.