Talk:9 to 5 Mac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

9 to 5 mac predicted the 3G iPod Nano and the aluminium iMac, they seem to be a Apple Rumor site worthy of having their own page Eraserhead1 (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

There is some ongoing work to expand discussion of sites talked about in Apple rumors community. I think it would be good to allow a little time for expansion to occur. If ultimately it appears that a stand-alone article is not appropriate, this should be folded back into the larger article rather than simply being deleted. WildCowboy (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

(edit conflicted)I can appreciate that -- what I'm interested in is whether there are reliable sources that testify to that notability. As per the above comment, I'm happy to remove my own tag until this can be sorted out. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

And have done so. I get the feeling that this is in good hands, so I apologize if I seemed to move too fast. If there is something I can do to help further, let me know. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem...thanks. I'm aware that properly referencing material on this whole topic is a high priority, so I'll see what I can do. WildCowboy (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)