User talk:99.224.59.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, CPE001346f7466f-CM001947577ab6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com, is registered to Rogers Communications, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] December 2007

  1. With regard to your comments on User talk:Karrmann: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Karrmann (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Pontiac Montana, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Karrmann (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  3. Dude, I know you are lieing. Ok, I know you are nothing more than a fan in denial that GM is exiting the minivan business. Please stop this bullcrap and the hoaxes. Karrmann (talk) 22:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 19:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Pontiac Montana, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Karrmann (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Karrmann (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to GM Lambda platform, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Karrmann (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Pontiac Montana

I don't understand why you are requesting that the Montana's Canadian site to be added to the Wikipedia article, because it is already there. Karrmann (talk) 04:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Karrmann (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 15 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

  jj137 18:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] unblock

(unblock the reason is i been trying to correct and revise the Pontiac Montana removing that it will nto be discontiuned but the adminstration Karrmann says i have in denial but i have got in contact wiht GM CANADA and they say they have no immidiate plans to Discontoue the Montana

Could you assist

Appears those are the very same edits that resulted in this block; can you provide verifiable sourcing for that information, or otherwise use talk pages to develop consensus regarding the most appropriate version? – Luna Santin (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

luna santin how can i send them to ya gys if they are in my e-mail boy which comes direclty form them

i consider you sohud contact them as well at www.gm.ca

Unfortunately, that sounds like original research; while it may well be the case that GM has plans to do something, unless those plans are announced someplace public (say, mainstream media) we pretty much have to go with the most reliable public sourcing available. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
You are not fooling anyone. I know that you are lieing, and I know that you are just a GM fan in denial of the Montana being discontinued. It is getting very annoying constantly reverting and reverting and reverting your hoax edits. I have done research, and I have read articles and reviewed the facts. The facts are that the current generation GM minivans were panned by the press. They sold poorly, and because of that, GM feels that their money is better spent on developing crossover SUVs. All of the minivans have received Lambda based successors, except for the Pontiac Montana, because Pontiac is going to stop producing vans and light trucks to refocus its sporty image. You can't claim that your brand offers sporty cars when you sell a minivan, can you?
All you have to back up your claims that GM is going to continue Montana production is an Autoblog article from two years ago saying that GMC is developing a minivan, and since I haven't heard anything about it ever since, I think it is safe to say that it got canned. Just telling us to contact GM Canada DOES NOT back up your claims, nor does it justify your constant hoaxing on the Montana article. I can see right through you. I know you are lieing. How? Your "facts" keep changing again and again. First you say it will be redesigned. Then you said it will get a face lift. Then you are saying that production will continue. Then you said production will only continue if GM Canada sees significant demand. If you are at least going to try to fool us, make one story and stick with it. But it too late now, we all know that you are lieing.
THis is your time to put up or shut up. If Pontiac Montana production is going to continue like you said, then show me. Show me a CURRENT article saying so. Don't tell me to contact GM Canada, don't say that your friend who works for GM Canada told you, don't tell me that you work for GM Canada, don't tell you emailed GM Canada and they told you, and don't create a hoax account and pose as a GM Canada representative. Show me an article from late 2007 that says that Montana production will continue and that GM won't close the Doraville, Georgia plant, or just go away and quit wasting my time. Karrmann (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism


  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Sandstein (talk) 09:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A-Channel Morning

You can't cite one of A-Channel's own press releases as support for the statement, because they're not an objective source. Wikipedia sources have to be independent of the article subject, per WP:RS. Bearcat (talk) 22:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)