User talk:92.235.160.40

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jack Deth has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 01:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Jack Deth. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! Uncle Milty (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Thesaunderschild has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Judith Gray, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Judith Gray was changed by 92.235.160.40 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-29T20:02:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (92.235.160.40) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 18:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unimpressed

Wikipedia is getting so boring. A lot of the pages are too rich in text. There should be a bigger fair use policy for pictures. Furthermore, every time I edit something, whether it be a wrestling personality or somebody, a mod just reverts my contributions for no reason. Also, I made a page called Jack Deth about a character who appears in multiple films. There are far worse articles on here that have nothing, but are still remaining. What gives? This has to be said. Beyond a joke, well and truly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.160.40 (talk) 08:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome. Please put new topics at the end of discussion pages, it makes chronological order much easier to follow. What do you mean by too rich in text? As in, they waffle? They use too many words to say a simple thing? You may be better off starting a topic at the Village pump - that's the place for general discussion, this talk page is mostly for discussing editing changes to the Community Portal. Also, what exactly do you mean by 'bigger fair use policy'? More words in the policy, more clearly defined? Or one with more room for interpretation? Or one that includes more images?
If your contributions keep getting reverted, it may be because they didn't conform to one or more of our policies on editing. They may have included common errors, such as addressing the reader with the second person pronoun (such as talking about a game, "You can use this item to cast spells" rather than "The player can use this item"), been non-neutral or tried to convince the reader of an idea, original research (such as your opinion on something, or your own analysis of a topic), contained too much trivia, or not verifiable. However, be bold, remember to always use edit summaries and don't get discouraged. Creating an account may also help you - you get preferences, your own name on the History tab of pages (so your contributions can be identified and praised) and much more respect in discussions and editing decisions. Many editors are very quick to distrust anonymous editors, since many of them turn out to be vandals.
About that article, Jack Deth - you may be interested to view the discussion that took place when somebody nominated the article for deletion. The reasons why it was not deemed worthy of inclusion are there - you can contest this if you like. A better idea would probably be to take content from the most recent version of Jack Deth before it was redirected, and merge it by yourself into the article Trancers, or any other relevant article. Getting an account before you do this will lend you some credibility if another editor objects - it's really a good idea. If you have any other problems, contact me on my own talk page, and I'll see if I can help you out. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 18:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)