User talk:92.0.34.53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Unblock

This is unfair. Just because a 'Mr WP' has vandilised, us other users should still be allowed to edit. This is a shared network. I know it will run out at 9.02, but still.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

original block message

  • Decline reason:

Considering the low amount of users using this network, I don't think this is catching any legitimate users. — -- lucasbfr talk 19:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

This network was only created a month or so ago. There isn't that many, but many users at least read WP and may create accounts.92.0.34.53 (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

representing lots of users.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This extended block is totally unreasonable. Everyone who, at least trys to edit is stopped. If you deny, please explain why this block has been extended. We all know about MrWP, but there is no reason to extend it."

Decline reason: "This user has been blocked for sockpuppetry and it has become evident that autoblocks are insufficient to stop violations of that policy (a suspicion which is backed up by your statement that you apparently all know about the blocked accounts). You can still read articles, you will just need to wait a while in order to edit. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

A user who uses this shared network has been blocked for sockpuppetry and it has become evident that autoblocks are insufficient to stop violations of that policy (a suspicion which is backed up by your statement that you apparently all know about the blocked accounts). Obviously, when you say "We all know about MrWP" you mean the case, not the account . You can still read articles, but you should not have to need to wait a while in order to edit as this is extremly wrong, and an example of vandilism by admins..