User talk:90.205.89.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, 5acd590b.bb.sky.com, is registered to British Sky Broadcasting, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by Bamford.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

You have been Blocked for Disruptive editing. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.--Hu12 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

How pathetic. Although I expect little else having seen how trivial and immature wiki is at first hand. Never in my forty years on this planet have I come across a less mature and pathetic bunch of moderators and I now realise why so many people think that wiki is innacurate and run by 13 year old amatuers. If the way I have been treat is any measure then forget it and go to a trusted source such as Britannica for information,

By the way Hu-12, the first reference doesn't work which was why I was changing it, and there is no conflict concerning the SOCA or NPIA pages as both merely state what the agencies do and this can be found on their websites, where I suggest individuals go if they want to learn more about these agencies. This page is also referenced back to official sources rather than made up.

If this is wikipedia and how it operates, then I will gladly go elsewhere for my trusted information and suggest others do the same. The only good thing that has come out of my experience has been the laugh that immature moderators such as crosbiesmith and Hu-12 have given myself, with their immature antics, as they sit round their bedrooms in boring Suburbs playing God on wiki.

Lifes too short and you are too pathetic and sad.

--90.205.89.11 (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] February 2008

  1. Welcome, and thank you for editing the page Serious Organised Crime Agency on Wikipedia. Please be careful not to remove maintenance templates from articles without addressing the issue listed. If you believe the tag is placed in error use the article's associated talk page to explain your changes. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)