User talk:90.198.115.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] March 2008

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Beatrice Arthur, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Carom (talk) 22:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Edna Parker has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Jane Boulton, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Carom (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Yone Minagawa. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Carom (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Erwin Geschonneck, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, CP 20:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Sockpuppet or not, past edit history has a pattern of disruptive editing including restoration of false and/or irrelevant material and the restoration of deleted images. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Cheers, CP 19:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Patkirkwoood for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Carom (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Gene Wilder. Thank you. Please be aware that using forced sizing for images, especially contained within infoboxes which are fixed at a specific size, is not advised and will skew proper viewing as determined by user preferences. By forcing the image in this article to a 350px perspective, it creates an outsized infobox which cannot display properly in all browsers. Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Bette Davis

PatKirkwoood, Please be aware of two things. Firstly, an image in an infobox is not supposed to exceed 200px, because the infobox has a proscribed size, and changing image sizes to larger, outsized sizes simply distorts the infobox, making it out of balance with the rest of the article. There actually isn't a good reason to set the size of an image in an infobox as it has a default size. Screen captures like the ones in this article are not high quality and the larger you make them, the grainier they become, and in the case of this particular image, the quality is poor, the image is dark. Secondly, this article is a featured article. It has been developed in a painstaking manner to reach this status and in general, unless something new has occurred in regard to the subject, it doesn't warrant changing. Changes such as you made really need to be brought up on the talk page for all concerned editors to address. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry to evade block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)