User talk:90.193.120.215

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The recent edit you made to Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg 16:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 18:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Ishrat-ul-Ibad Khan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your edits

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. The problem with your edit was it removed content that was written from a neutral point of view and added info that was not cited and was written in a style that promoted the guy the article is about. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia must present both sides of an argument and must consist of content that is neutral and encyclopedic. Thingg 23:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)