User talk:89.100.88.180

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Fat acceptance movement. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moyabrit (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Quartet 21:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to Gothic rock (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Gothic rock constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Review) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC))

[edit] April 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Phoenix Park. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snappy56 (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

and can you stop vandalising my talk page as well? Snappy56 (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandlism, despite repeated warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I did not vandalise anything. According to britannica, Phoenix park is the largest enclosed urban public park in europe. The fact that richmond park is bigger is irrelevant. It is not urban, it is suburban. It is not a public park, it is a royal park to which the public have access. There is no reason to include that information on the page. Adding that reference would be akin to adding a reference to Elephant Seals to the Capybara page. The capybara article specifies that they are the largest living rodent. One could well add the addendum "but elephant seals are bigger", but that is completely and utterly irrelevant- As is the reference to richmond park."

Decline reason: "Several of your older edits consist of removing a large amount of text, which was seen as disruptive and you were warned for. Throwing in a few "good" edits between vandalism is not a justification to avoid a block. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.