User talk:87.6.194.103

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Tearing apart Trevi and Bevagna

Umm, what do you have against these places? Don't you realize there's considerably more to be said about the territories of each? Instead of tearing things down, you'd be more useful rounding them out with the fullest information so that Wikipedia can become what it is trying to be. At first I thought you were just objecting to contentless stuff — fair nuff — although I noticed right away that you depopulated one category and now are trying to junk the category on the grounds that there was only one item in it!!! — but now it seems that either, as a newcomer to Wikipedia you don't quite get the idea of the place, or that you have something very much like vandalism in mind. Propertius and Mevania are other members of the category Category:Bevagna by the way; and there are prolly one or two other legitimate things that belong in the category. Bill (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey man

Hey man, these conversation looks like to me as vandalism. I've nothing againist these place, but i think you've created it only for : "campanilismo". Ok ? Why don't you create another category:Bevagna on it.wikipedia ? Because they will delete it in few minutes. So, shut up boy and leave me alone ! You don't interest me !

Bill, don't you permit to talk to me anymore in that way. Understood !!!??? Or i smash your face

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Removing legitimate content

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] We need to talk.

Alrighty then, I have a number of things that I need to discuss with you, firstly please nominate categories for CSD correctly, blanking the article while you do the nomination is not the way to go, and like wise when you do nominate a category for deletion and the deletion is successful, only then do you remove the category from the appropriate pages. Secondly, your attitude is poor and in breach of wp:civil, you shouldn't go around accusing everyone of being a vandal, wikipedia is not a battle ground and shouldn't be treated as such. Thirdly you and User:Bill Thayer, while I agree with you that the link that is on many of the pages involved is self promotional, it doesn't give you the right to through the word 'vandal' around like its going out of fashion, and connected with this is that you don't assume good faith, because I believe while bill thayer's links are self-promotional, he is also trying to improve the article. I even believe perhaps some what naively that you are too.

Now there 2 path ways this can go down, either you can go down at this point, you can either disscuss this issue with me and bill thayer, and we can resolve this issue peacefully like decent folk, or we can continueally revert each others edits until we have a nice revert war on hands and this ends up on the 3R noticeboard.

The ball is your court.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 15:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Where ?

It seems to me that you are involved in a content dispute with this user over several Italy-related categories. The correct way to handle this is to discuss your disagreements with the user concerned, and not to accuse them of vandalism when they are trying to improve the encyclopedia (see Wikipedia:Vandalism for a definition of vandalism). If they have made personal attacks on you (and you have presented no evidence that they have) then the best place to report it is at WP:ANI. Hut 8.5 16:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for making threats from your other ip

Regarding this edit, which obviously came from you;

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)