User talk:86.6.207.111

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RexNL 18:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Lobster Telephone

Your recent edit to Lobster Telephone (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari 21:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Lobster Telephone (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 21:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Please quit removing the entire text of the article. If you have a problem with it, please replace it with {{copyvio}} and list your reasoning. Naconkantari 21:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

What Naconkantari said pretty much covers it, copyvio tags are a good thing :) -- Tawker 00:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Supersize

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ~ EmeZxX 08:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tetsugen

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Tetsugen, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ubiquity 14:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Robin Hood. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 10:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Robin Hood. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch 10:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

[edit] Your edit to B3ta

Your recent edit to B3ta (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock-auto|1=86.6.207.111|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rod Hull and Hitler". The reason given for Rod Hull and Hitler's block is: "

[edit] Your edit to Bernard Trevor Matthews

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Bernard Trevor Matthews, you will be blocked from editing. Bridgeplayer 22:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) (last warning)

[edit] Your edit to Daz Sampson

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Daz Sampson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TomPhil 23:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Just because you give a reference to something does not make it true or encyclopedic. Whether or not Daz Sampson looks like Ian Huntley is clearly point of view and unencyclopedic. It is also potentially libel. Edits claiming that Daz looks like Huntley have been removed many times before from this article. They are not appropriate. TomPhil 09:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked you for a week for continually inserting those inappropriate edits. I'm reasonably sure I've warned you about this before (when you had a different IP), but even if I didn't, you were warned enough. Please learn your lesson. If you promise to stop doing this, I will unblock. Otherwise, the block stands. --Deskana (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deskana

Deskana, I think what you actually said was that editors should not make claims about Sampson looking like Huntley unless there were valid sources for this - and that is exactly what I did, writing so as not to express a view and giving sources. I first suggested the other editor discuss it on the talk page and he did not. Then I suggested he went to RFC and he did not. So why have you banned me without any warning? 86.6.207.111 21:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

You were warned. Look in the section above. Regardless of what I may or may not have said in the past, I agree with TomPhil that it is not encyclopedic. What is the encyclopedic purpose of mentioning that he may or may not look like Ian Huntley. It doesn't enrich the article at all or help people know about him as a person. So there you are. Argue all you want, it's not going in the article. --Deskana (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
OK, I understand what you are saying, but what have I been banned for? 86.6.207.111 17:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
20:59, 21 March 2007 Deskana (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "86.6.207.111 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (repeated and totally inappropriate edits to Daz Sampson)
---Deskana (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)