User talk:86.42.146.214
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In reverting Ireland to what you think is an NPOV version, you've also reverted loads of non-contentious changes. How stupid! Arcturus 21:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
if you continue to remove sourced information from articles, you may be blocked from editing. dab (ᛏ) 12:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Where is your source, some crazy professor? 86.42.146.214 12:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- welcome to Wikipedia, you might like to look at WP:5P and other introductory pages before you continue banging your head against walls. dab (ᛏ) 15:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, you are quite right there. You are a bit of a wall-head alright. Have a nice day. 86.42.146.214 15:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- welcome to Wikipedia, you might like to look at WP:5P and other introductory pages before you continue banging your head against walls. dab (ᛏ) 15:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Where is your source, some crazy professor? 86.42.146.214 12:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Plastic Paddy
Plastic Paddy isn't exactly uncommon: Google usenet: 522; Google web: 585 unique; Google news archive: 69. If you don't think the article should be there, what you'll be wanting is to get it transwikied to Wiktionary, where it belongs. I'd happily tell you how to transwiki it, but I haven't the foggiest myself. HAND, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- It's silly article. As an article it serves little purpose. WP could be filled with such pejoratives. It's usually used by the media, it hasn't common usage. 86.42.146.214 22:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- There are no end of silly articles on Wikipedia, not that that's any reason to keep this one. It's common enough that ignorant foreigners like me had heard it ten years ago. If I ever do figure out how to move stuff to Wiktionary, I'll move this. But there's nothing stopping you deleting it. Add
{{subst:prod|This is a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary.}}
to the top of the page and after five days, if nobody removes it in the meantime, the article will most likely be zapped. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)- Thanks, that'll get some heads twigging! 86.42.146.214 22:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- There are no end of silly articles on Wikipedia, not that that's any reason to keep this one. It's common enough that ignorant foreigners like me had heard it ten years ago. If I ever do figure out how to move stuff to Wiktionary, I'll move this. But there's nothing stopping you deleting it. Add
[edit] Disruption and WP:Sock
I am reproducing the following exchange from my talk page so other editors can see it:
-
- Whois angry? Maybe you are. I don't understand the term. Come to think of it, I don't know who you are either! LOL. A cara, hope you don't mind other people having an opinion. Slainte. 86.42.146.214 00:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- You have posted various talk page comments in all caps and with many exclamation points. This is generally perceived as shouting. You have also been using profanity and insults in some of your edit summaries. This violates WP:Civil. As you have often been contentious in some of these comments, it is not unreasonable to perceive these things as anger. While I am not angry, I do find some of your recent actions, such as your screaming "No POPERY around here!!!!!!!!!!!" on the Halloween article, and your abuse of NPOV templates by posting the template on an entire article when you disagree with a minor point in a subsection, to be counterproductive and not helpful to the encyclopedia. Your actions so far are those of someone who has come here more to pick fights than contribute. --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 01:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Where is your sense of humour, mainly tongue in cheek stuff, under the influence of a little wine perhaps. No, not you. Me! I have a user name, and you are not getting it. I only use it when I'm sober, HeHeHe. Just because I might be off the mark sometimes, well that doesn't make you correct. No POPERY around here!!!!!!!!!!! was a very targeted response to a particular editor. It was very appropiate. Now where was I with this novel that I'm trying to finish?? 86.42.146.214 01:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- You have posted various talk page comments in all caps and with many exclamation points. This is generally perceived as shouting. You have also been using profanity and insults in some of your edit summaries. This violates WP:Civil. As you have often been contentious in some of these comments, it is not unreasonable to perceive these things as anger. While I am not angry, I do find some of your recent actions, such as your screaming "No POPERY around here!!!!!!!!!!!" on the Halloween article, and your abuse of NPOV templates by posting the template on an entire article when you disagree with a minor point in a subsection, to be counterproductive and not helpful to the encyclopedia. Your actions so far are those of someone who has come here more to pick fights than contribute. --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 01:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Using one account to do edits for which you wish to be accountable, and another for the purpose of disruption, violates Wikipedia policy on Sockpuppetry. While the right to edit under an IP is protected, if you routinely use your IP, or other IPs in your range which are obviously you, as in effect a "second account" to avoid accountability, you are risking being banned. Specifically see: WP:Sock#"Good hand, bad hand" accounts --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 22:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |