User talk:86.3.16.24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of 86.3.16.24.
Please refer to Special:Contributions/86.3.16.24 for evidence. See block log.
It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of 172.214.48.223.
Please refer to Special:Contributions/172.214.48.223 for evidence. See block log.
It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Dogtoyco.
Please refer to Special:Contributions/Dogtoyco for evidence. See block log.

Hi. Please avoid putting external links in the main body of articles, especially when we already have an existing Wikipedia article. Add external links to the External links section of the article instead. Exploding Boy 16:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --Jamoche 01:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] final warning passed

This user is actually user User:Dogtoyco who has been warned multiple times for spam, they seem to think that they have the right to promote their website via wikipedia - see 86.3.16.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) and Dogtoyco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Blanking Content

[1] Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Image:Monkeyman.pngMonkeyman(talk) 02:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:86.3.16.24. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~ Butros (Talk) 23:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing Warnings

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. - Trysha (talk) 23:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Mwanner | Talk 14:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clicker training

You wrote: "Why did you remove my link from clicker_training whitch was non commercial where as the link above it is just selling a product nothing else..."

Hey, Dogtoyco, long time no see! When you're right, you're right! That horse link was spam, just like your edit to that and two other articles eight hours earlier. My bad! Thanks for removing it! BTW, it's "relevant", not "relevent", and "which", not "whitch".
I can't quite agree, though, that the links you added were non-commercial; heading the page is the message "Postage and packing is now free on UK orders over £30.00. All other orders pay just £2.50 flat shipping rate." Kinda says it all, no? -- Mwanner | Talk 00:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing Warnings

Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism by many Wikipedia editors. If you continue to remove warnings from your talk page, you may lose your privilege of editing your talk page. -- Mwanner | Talk 16:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


But these are so old they shud be removed. if i stick a warning on your page you would remove it whats the diff? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.16.24 (talk • contribs)
The diff is that you can't seem to stop spamming, as you did yet again here. -- Mwanner | Talk 13:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during January 25, 2007 (UTC) to Hollywood, Los Angeles, California

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Dream:

Your recent edit to Dream (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Dream page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kamope · talk · contributions 18:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)